http://museum-security.org/
securma@xs4all.nl
April 9, 1998
CONTENTS:
- G-Man's Raison d'Etre: Pilfered Art (Fox News Online)
- U.S. looting (Anonymous)
- The Performance of Temporary Protection Assistants
as an Adjunct to The Guard Force (Roger Wulff)
- Dispute about paintings (Sueddeutsche Zeitung, Samstag/Sonntag 28/29 Maerz 1998)
- re: use of student officers (Indianapolis Museum of Art)
- Information of Jewel Theft (rfdavis@friend.ly.net)
- Exhibition Loans (Rosemary Haddad)
- Schiele-paintings: Hearing again delayed ("Die Presse", Wien)
- Earthquake reveals new fresco from 15th century (Daily Telegraph
London)
- Re: student guards (Steve Keller: IntlArtCop@aol.com)
- Nazi loot (Victoria Cranner: ics@SHORE.NET)
- Volunteers and Security ("Robert T. Handy" handy@BCHM.ORG)
- Sculptor defends taking body parts (Daily Telegraph London)
- Artist defends use of human body parts (Times of London)
- Heritage Lottery Fund chief in UKPounds:30m farewell (Daily
Telegraph London)
- Arts centre wins UKPounds:7.5m lottery cash (Daily Telegraph London)
- Re: Lakota study ("The Performance of Temporary Protection
Assistants as an Adjunct to the Guard Force at the Hirshhorn
Museum"): Steve Keller IntlArtCop@aol.com
- missing Italian art (Teresa Prestwood writer5@hotmail.com)
- Beijing's oldest stone statue of Buddha has been stolen from its home
in a suburban village (BBC UK News)
- Partnership opportunities for Federally-associated collections
(Sally Shelton sshelton@sdnhm.org )
- Volunteers and Security (Thread of six messages forwarded from
Museum-L)
- U.S. to Host Second Meeting on Nazi Looting (WASHINGTON, Reuters)
- Tenant stole UKPounds: 1/2 m art from his flat (Times of London)
- Master of all forgers (Tages Anzeiger, Zuerich, 02.04.98)
- Deceased Collector Bestows Art Riches Upon National Gallery
(Washington Post) THE NETHERLANDS MY HAVE CLAIM ON VAN GOGH
PAINTING.
- Murder of art restorer is linked to serial killer (Daily Telegraph
London April 3, 1998)
with background articles:
-Who murdered the count with a candelabra as he played Bach fugues?
(Jan. 18, 1997)
-Murder linked to art scandal (February 9, 1997)
- Painting at the centre of smuggling claim returned (February 8, 1997)
More at: http://museum-security.org/ follow the link to 1997 reports.
- security devices opinions requested (Michael P Crimmins
mpc584@world.std.com)
- Renumeration of Security/Front of House Staff (Trevor Reynolds
trevor@CAERLAS.DEMON.CO.UK)
- a painful matter
- Smart System (IntlArtCop )
- Artist is jailed over theft of body parts (Daily Telegraph, Sue
Clough, Courts Correspondent)
- Customs officials pluck art at border (By Diane R. Stepp, The Atlanta
Journal-Constitution)
- Claims to Greek goddesses; Italy suspects smugglers got artifacts to
US collector (Walter V. Robinson, Globe Staff, 04/04/98)
- Austria Confronts Its Shameful Past; Reality of Collaboration With
Nazis Replaces Myth of Victimization (By William Drozdiak Washington
Post Foreign Service Saturday, April 4, 1998)
- Re: a painful matter, ICOM/ICMS (antonia.kriks@munich.netsurf.de)
- 1998 NM Heritage Preservation Week Calendar of events
- Disaster recovery and natural history collections (ConsDisList:
sshelton@sdnhm.org)
- Treasures of Assisi further damaged by new wave of quake (Daily
Telegraph London)
- Confidentiality policy (Bill Parker
parker.166@postbox.acs.ohio-state.edu)
- Russia: Germans Expect To Challenge Art Ruling (Radio Free Europe)
- Yeltsin plan to return looted art thwarted (BBC News)
- Russian war booty: the judges rule (BBC News)
- Court Tells Yeltsin to Sign Booty Art Law (Russia Today)
- Swiss defer comment on looted art until report out (Reuters )
- Yeltsin calls trophy art ruling a ``slap in face'' (Reuters)
- SUPREME COURT HEARS NEA DECENCY CASE
- Russians urged to return art (The Age Australia)
- Finally, a verdict in the case that has shocked the art world (The Age
Australia)
- Bowie and Boyd "hoax" art world (BBC News)
- British joke falls flat in New York (Times of London)
G-Man's Raison d'Etre: Pilfered Art (Fox News Online)
PHILADELPHIA (AP) - Over the past few years, FBI special agent Robert
K. Wittman has gone undercover to recover millions of dollars worth of
stolen goods.
Not drugs. Or guns. Or counterfeit cash. This G-man tracks down
stolen art.
Wittman is one of a trio of FBI special agents who specialize in
recovering objects of cultural heritage pilfered from museums and
private collections.
He has recovered a number of priceless objects, ranging from Civil
War-era swords and rifles stolen from a historical society to a
smuggled piece of ancient Peruvian body armor worth $1.6 million.
For Wittman, finding stolen art gets personal.
"If you take a 2,000-year-old piece of history away from Peru, you're
destroying the cultural heritage of that people," he said. "You're
taking away the opportunity for them to see something beautiful their
ancestors made.
"It's a crime against humanity."
When the Historical Society of Pennsylvania discovered several
missing items last year during a computerized inventory of its 12,000
artifacts, they called the FBI.
Led by Wittman, who posed as an art dealer, the FBI team uncovered
more than 200 items smuggled out during a 10-year period and arrested
a museum janitor and a Civil War collector in January.
Included in the recovered booty was a sword presented to Union Gen.
George Meade after the Battle of Gettysburg and a rifle used by
abolitionist John Brown during his raid at Harpers Ferry, W.Va.
The recovery of the items - each valued at between $2 million and $3
million - was a triumph for the FBI's stolen art team.
"You can read all you want about history," Wittman said. "But to
touch George Washington's tea caddy or hold John Brown's rifle brings
it all home."
Raised in Baltimore, Wittman grew up among art and memorabilia at his
family's antique shop. "I was always into old stuff," he said with a
smile.
That appreciation carried over when he joined the FBI a decade ago
and helps fuel his desire to protect the past from selfish hands.
The first step is getting museums to ask for help in tracking down
stolen artifacts. Institutions and museums are often reluctant to
report art thefts, afraid of publicity or the stigma that might reduce
donations.
The FBI has been aided by what Wittman calls the "big hammer" - the
1994 federal Theft of Major Artwork statute, which gives the FBI
jurisdiction over thefts from museums, public institutions and
libraries.
The statute provides for a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison and
a fine for anyone convicted of stealing an item more than 100 years
old and worth more than $5,000.
Wittman, 42, said he gets a thrill out of finding stolen relics that
his grandchildren may one day see hanging on a wall, rather than
wrapped in a towel in someone's basement.
But the camera-shy federal agent downplays his own efforts, saying an
"investigation is an investigation whether it's a Monet or a
Cadillac."
Assistant U.S. Attorney Robert Goldman, who prosecutes the art cases,
said Wittman gets a sense of personal satisfaction in seeing stolen
items returned.
"When these cases come out, he gets excited and he wants to solve
them," Goldman said. "He enjoys being the good guy."
c 1998 Associated Press. All rights reserved.
c 1998, News America Digital Publishing, Inc. d/b/a Fox News Online.
Date sent: Fri, 27 Mar 1998 20:39:39 -0400
From: CIT Computer Lab User pgailitis@hotmail.com
To: securma@museum-security.org
Subject: U.S. looting.
I am interested in all accounts and incidents of looting by American
servicemen.This regrettable activity has been far more common than
anyone suspects, largely due to it not being a very popular topic. By
way of illustration, members of my family (a refugee non-German
grandmother and child) were robbed in their home by intruding U.S.
soldiers during the American occupation of Germany in 1945. I mention
this to show that the Allies were no more pure than the Germans in
this activity, just less organized. If they would do this to helpless
civilians, what else were they capable of ?
From: Roger Wulff museplan@erols.com
Organization: Museum Services International
Subject: The Performance of Temporary Protection Assistants
as an Adjunct to The Guard Force ----
Dear Ton:
As an old museum-horse, I have some weird things in my library. One
of them is a copy (probably one of the only copies - don't know if
Dave Liston has one) of a Final Report/study done by Robert Lakota at
the Smithsonian entitled "The Performance of Temporary Protection
Assistants as an Adjunct to the Guard Force at the Hirshhorn Museum"
1975 and marked "administratively confidential."
This document has a bearing on the recent discussion of students
guards on the list - because these temporary assistants were half
college graduates and half were seniors in college. The report was
generally favorable to the function of these assistants - perhaps
that's why its marked confidential - it went against the feelings of
the Director of SI Guards at that time.
If you are interested in the report, perhaps I could talk Dave into
mailing a copy - 65 pages is too much to fax and I don't have a
scanner to enter it into my computer.
Kind Regards
Roger
Sueddeutsche Zeitung, Samstag/Sonntag 28/29 Maerz 1998
Dispute about paintings
The Dutch Government refuses to give back about 150 paintings from
state museums to the heirs of the Jewish art dealer Jaques
Goudstikker. Aad Nuis, State Sekretary in charge of arts had a look
into the demands of the heirs. The results of the investigation proof
the paintings being lawfully owned by the state of The Netherlands.
Before the war Goudstikker has been the biggest art dealer of The
Netherlands. When in 1940 the Germans moved in he was able to flee
but got killed by an accident. Employes sold the collection two months
later under value to the German NS-'Reichsmarschall' Hermann Göring.
After the war The Netherlands took the paintings back and integrated
some of the most important paintings (amongst them objects of
Rembrandt and Jan Steen) into the state museums. The descendants of
Goudstikker who today live in the USA consider this being illegal.
Nevertheless Aad Nuis refered to the fact that the widow of
Goudstikker in 1952 disclaimed and made an agreement with the state of
The Netherlands: ,One cannot change history after 50 years because one
regrets a decision subsequently", he said. The heirs now will take
legal steps. But two other paintings from state property shortly will
be given back to private owners. It became apparent that those work of
art during the ware got into wrong ownership. The legal owners laid
claim on it last year.
From: "Brent,Lori & Colin Snider"
Subject: re: use of student officers (Indianapolis Museum of Art)
It is wrong to classify all Student Officers as unreliable. To think
otherwise might be grounds for discrimation on the basis of age ("kids
are kids!"). As long as the Security Director/Manager has in place
appropriate policies and procedures regarding attendance, job duties
and responsibilities, a strong training program, and set Standards of
Conduct, the Student Officer should know what is expected of him/her.
To "stick" them in a gallery without ensuring that they have received
adequate training along with instruction, follow-up, and Supervision
is not only a disservice to the Officer, but also to the institution.
It is up to Security Management to coach, mentor, and direct the
Officers, no matter what his or her background is. Guess what Mr.
Keller?.....I have a Liberal Arts B.A. from Indiana University. I was
a student working as a Security Officer at the Indianapolis Museum of
Art, and I found that the training and guidance that I received added
to my perception of the institution as a whole. I feel that not only
can I appreciate the artwork on display, but I also understand the
importance of preserving the heritage of the institution for future
generations. One of my Supervisors has a B.A. in Art History, and may
I say that this individual cares more about the artwork, it's
preservation and security, than anyone else at the institution, simply
because she knows her responsibilities and is capable of using her
educational background to our advantage.
If a Security Manager / Director is hiring people with "shit happens"
shirts, or has an attitude that is not conducive to the operation
(this is where Uniform and Appearance policies and Standards of
Conduct policies come into place), then it is the Security
Manager/Director's fault for not screening and interviewing to hire
the right people for the job. Tough luck to anyone who doesn't take
the time to select individuals who will be right for the team. I have
no pity for them. But do not place everyone in the same basket simply
because of his/her educational background or current class schedule -
you may be denying a quality individual an opportunity to excel in a
field many know nothing about.
Brent C. Snider, CST
Director of Protection Services
Indianapolis Museum of Art
Information of Jewel Theft (rfdavis@friend.ly.net)
Requesting information, for research purposes, on the theft of the
Prince of Wales jewels from St. James Palace in February, 1995.
Please contact sender at rfdavis@friend.ly.net
Thank you,
@@@
Moderator's reply:
At http://museum-security.org/ you will find a link enabling you to
download all 1997 MSN messages. If you do some digging you will find
several messages about this subject.
T.C.
@@@
Exhibition Loans (Rosemary Haddad)
Dear colleagues: I am working on a policy for the CCA Library
regarding outgoing loans to exhibitions, and I would like to benefit
from the wisdom and experience of other institutions. I would
particularly like to hear from rare book libraries with resident
scholars and/or busy reading rooms, and how you establish a balance
between providing for your on-site users and making your collection
known by participating in important exhibitions at other venues. If
you have a written policy, I would appreciate receiving it via e-mail,
or fax (514 939-7020), or snail mail at: Canadian Centre for
Architecture, 1920, rue Baile, Montreal, Quebec, H3H 2S6, CANADA.
If you have only an unwritten policy, a few informal lines via this
listserv would be very helpful, as would a telephone call (514
939-7000, ext. 1374). Thank you in advance for your help. Best
regards, Rosemary Haddad.
(translation: Antonia Kriks antonia.kriks@munich.netsurf.de)
Montag, 30. Maerz 1998
Schiele-paintings: Hearing again delayed ("Die Presse", Wien)
There is another delay on the dispute about the Schiele paintings from
the collection Leopold which where confiscated in January in New York:
The Museum of Modern Art (MoMa) again postponed a meeting with
district attorney Morgenthau. On this meeting the museum was expected
to deliver it's answer to the application of the district attorney.
There where no reasons mentioned for the delay. According to the
district attorney's office the answer of MoMa is expected but on 3rd
of April. Then it will be decided as well wether the appointment for
the judicial decision in April can be kept. In opinion of the museum
the district attorney violated the law about Arts and Cultural Affairs
by confiscating the paintings.
Copyright "Die Presse", Wien
Earthquake reveals new fresco from 15th century (Daily Telegraph
London)
By Bruce Johnston in Rome
A RENAISSANCE fresco found behind a church wall just before the
present series of earthquakes hit Umbria last September has now been
almost totally destroyed by the seismic activity. But, in turn, it has
revealed an older one hiding on a inner wall behind it, which experts
say is in pristine condition. The discovery of the early 15th-century
fresco of the Crucifixion with St Michael in Postignano in Umbria's
lush Nera Valley was the only good news this weekend, after the 10th
earthquake in sixth months. Although there was only minor damage this
time, the tremor, measuring 4.7 on the Richter Scale and felt as far
away as Rome and Venice, created what Franco Barbieri, the junior
minister for civil protection, yesterday called a "terrible
psychological impact" on the local population. Two elderly people died
of heart attacks, and many others were now said to be suffering from
psychological disorders caused by insecurity and homelessness as a
result of thousands of tremors that have occurred since September.
Many in the central part of Italy affected are now on sedatives.
Dozens of schools in both regions closed to enable new structural
checks to be carried out. "No one can foretell an earthquake or the
length of time it will last," said Mr Barbieri yesterday. "But however
bad seismic activity is, it hardly ever exceeds the force of the main
quake. And if the experts have deemed a building to be safe, it means
it can withstand a tremor of the same magnitiude of the original one."
The continuing tremors have now shaken off 70 per cent of the original
fresco at Postignano. The work, which depicts the Martyrdom of San
Lorenzo with other saints, had been discovered only recently behind
centuries of plaster during restoration and was deemed to be
"sensational".
Subject: Re: student guards (Steve Keller: IntlArtCop@aol.com)
In a message dated 3/30/98 12:33:31 PM, you wrote:
Brent C. Snider, CST, Director of Protection Services, Indianapolis
Museum of Art commented that my attitude about student guards may be
discriminatory, that I may be doing a disservice to the guard and the
museum, and that Guards are no less reliable that anyone else.
Please let me clarify:
1. Not hiring student guards is not discriminatory under any law of
the U.S. Age is an issue over 40 years only.
2. My point is not that
student guards should not be used, only that MY experience (20 years
in museum security, eight working in a museum with its own art college
attached and a guard force that was as high as 350 guards during major
exhibits, and being a consultant to over 200 museums including many
with colleges), it is my opinion that you can generally get better
overall protection for your collection if you hire professional guards
with maturity and life's experience.
3. You are correct that you can
supervise and train student guards. You can supervise and train
prisoners, too, but who has the time. Joking, Brent, don't get upset.
Seriously, most museums are short on supervisors and lack a training
officer and find it difficult to administer a "difficult" schedule, so
student guards are not for them. No hard feelings. No discrimination.
Just a fact based on my experience INCLUDING at Indiana University, I
might add.
4. I HAD excellent policies and procedures in Chicago. In
fact, I had the first comprehensive policy manual of any major museum
and it was widely distributed and forms the basis of many museum
manuals today. We even had a line item in our budget to print and
distribute to other museums our manual. But nevertheless, I still had
problems with student guards. While I never personally had anyone walk
in with a "shit happens" T-shirt on, I can guarantee you that if I
did, it would not have been one of my 60 year old guards and it would
probably be someone wearing green hair and earrings in his naval. Just
my prejudice, I guess.
5. If you blow off the above, then pay close
attention to this: After the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum theft in
Boston, I was doing some consulting for them and as a result received
a lot of press inquiries. One of the things that the press was trying
to do was fix blame. And one of the things they kept hitting on was
the fact that the Gardner used student guards. "Why didn't they use
professionals?" "Why didn't they use people with life's experience?"
One reporter told me, "If they would have had some crusty old 65 year
old man on duty instead of some kids, they would not have fallen for
the fake cop charade". It is hard for me to argue against that. My
people in Chicago had a similar incident when someone came to the door
claiming to be the Secret Service needing access at 10 pm at night due
to some motorcade for the President on Michigan Avenue. My Night
Manager politely told them to come back with Chicago Police with them,
then he called the Chicago police who dispatched someone to check out
the Agents before opening the doors. They checked out and they were
angry. Tough! Their job it to protect the President. Ours is to
protect our art. They have their problems and we have ours. I
attribute maturity and life's experience to their ability to withstand
the pressure and hold firm. You can't cover every situation with a
policy! 6. Someone wrote in last week saying that we have a serious
job and that we need to do the best for our employers that we can by
hiring the best we can afford. I wanted to comment in support of that
message but didn't do so because too many of my clients might be
offended. But it's true. We spare no expense in hiring the best
lighting consultant or international architect or we paint and repaint
the gallery many times until we get it just right. But when it comes
to hiring guards, the security program becomes a convenient location
to place students who need to be placed as part of the work study
program or a good place to hire guards for the ill-fated CETA program.
(Remember CETA. If you hired a CETA employee --hard core
unemployables--the government matched the funds. I had a dozen museums
who ran out and hired CETA employees because they were cheap bodies).
Why doesn't security get the first string for a change? Why do we
always need to hire at the lowest wage from the most inexperienced
manpower pool?
If you have a small gallery with a relatively inexpensive and
unimportant collection, then hire whomever you want to protect it. But
if you have $50 million dollars to protect, you better think twice
about turning the building over to a couple of unarmed and, I might
add, untrained, students. All due respects to your training program
but you don't train your people well enough to protect a $50 million
collection from the type of potential assault you might face by
someone determined to take it over. People are walking into museums
with guns these days. I'm not looking for goons to confront them but I
want someone with maturity and common sense if only to handle the
aftermath.
When I went to Chicago in 1979, the guard force was 90% male and night
shifts were 100% male. Previous management recruited crusty old men
with drinking problems except for one guy who had only one arm
(couldn't carry a radio, flashlight and keys at the saem time) and
five who didn't speak ANY English (and couldn't be trained or
supervised in English). I changed that by looking for a diverse group
of guards. I then studied all of them to see who really served our
needs best. I found that the best guard was the female, age 45 to 50
who was just returning to the workforce after raising the kids. I
found that NO security experience was better in a museum than "hard"
security experience such as working as a guard on a construction site.
"Retired" housewives were great managers, great diplomats, and made
great supervisors after a year of experience. The next group I found
to be exceptional were the retired mill workers, age 60 or higher, who
appreciated being spoken to politely, working in a museum with 70
degree temperture and 50 percent relative humidity where they never
got dirty hands. Treat them right and they would treat you right. They
were used to getting out of bed in the morning and getting to work in
the snow. But I also always maintained a few tough guys. Someone had
to be willing and able to engage in confrontation if needed. It was
rarely--but occasionally--needed. Who made the worst guards--in my
personal opinion? Students. Teachers on summer break. And college
grads. For a spell there, I recruited a number of people who had
higher education. Few really worked out. Few stayed long enough to
make their training worthwhile. I did have a few good students and a
few good teachers and a few good college educated guards. But it was
the mix that made my guard force strong. Don't be offended by my
opinion, Brent, but maybe we are looking at this from different
perspectives. There is a place in some museums for some student
guards. But they should never be the basis of a guard force--in my
opinion.
Steve Keller, CPP
(Museum-L)
Organization: International Catacomb Society
Subject: Nazi loot (Victoria Cranner: ics@SHORE.NET)
Museum list readers I need your opinions.
I'm a graduate student at Tufts university researching the issues of
Nazi loot. This is a dificult question for everyone involved and I am
hoping to look at ways to resolve this issue and prevent other
problems from happening. I have two questions and would like to hear
from as many people as possible on this issue.
My first question is about resolution. What do you in the U.S. museum
community think is the best way to resolve this issue with as much
fairness as possible. In the broad sense, what governing body should
be overseeing these issues and making decisions on who owns the art?
Court System? International arbitration commitee? Some other body?
In the more individual sense, are their different ways of dealing
with compensation rather than taking it out of the public domain.(
And how would these negotiations be handled ?) Joint ownership?
Financial compensation in leu of reparation? Other ideas?
My second question is how the museum community can look to the future
and try to prevent museums, either willingly or unwillingy, from
becoming involved in issues of stolen art? Self governing
body,stronger laws.?
Any additional thoughts will be welcome. I will not use anyone's name
in my paper without specific permission
Thank You
Victoria Cranner
Organization: Brazoria County Historical Museum
Subject: Volunteers and Security ("Robert T. Handy" handy@BCHM.ORG)
Would appreciate some feedback on using volunteers to open the museum.
Our current policy states that the building will be open only when at
least one professional staff person is on site. The only exception is
Sunday afternoons, when two volunteers are at the reception desk from
1:00 to 4:00. We are a secured facility, so the County's Security
guard opens the doors and sets the alarm. The volunteers do not have
the code and even the guard does not have the secondary code (if he
opens at the wrong time he will receive a phone call and if he can't
give the secondary code, the police are called).
It has been suggested that we could keep the building open evenings
if we could select some reliable, trustworthy volunteers to open,
close, and monitor activities inside. Currently we do not open for
evening activities unless a staff person volunteers to be here (can't
pay overtime).
In this mornings discussion about using volunteers, I could not come
up with a rational reason reliable volunteers should be trusted any
less than a staff person. In the absence of good arguments I am
inclined to take another look at the policy.
Any comments?
--
Bob Handy, Director
Brazoria County Historical Museum
100 East Cedar
Angleton, Texas 77515
(409) 864-1208
(409) 864-1217 (Fax)
http://www.bchm.org
Sculptor defends taking body parts (Daily Telegraph London)
BY KATHRYN KNIGHT
A sculptor accused of stealing human remains from the Royal College
of Surgeons yesterday vehemently denied having a "morbid fascination
with death".
Anthony-Noel Kelly told the jury at Southwark Crown Court that he
found beauty in anatomy and only wanted to "demystify" death. He said
he did not believe he had done anything wrong in taking the anatomical
specimens because it was a natural continuation of his work.
"I felt that my work was very important and these pieces would help
me in my pursuit of knowledge, pursuit of life," he said.
Mr Kelly, 42, took the stand at the opening of the defence case at
the trial against him and Niel Lindsay, 25, a former laboratory
technician. The pair deny theft from the Royal College and Mr Kelly
denies one further count of handling stolen goods.
Questioned by Terry Munyard, for the defence, Mr Kelly, 42, explained
that as an artist working from life models he had been invited to
watch and sketch operations at the RCS. "It was a chance to look at
the body at my own leisure. I could literally open up one of these
large trays , bring out a limb, a torso, a head and have a look, see
what is underneath the skin, and that was an incredible piece of
research."
He took anatomical specimens home because "I felt I needed an actual
part of a limb or a torso or whatever to convey this symbolic
language, to convey the aesthetic pursuit."
The trial continues.
Artist defends use of human body parts (Times of London)
By Sue Clough
AN ARTIST accused of using stolen human body parts for his
sculptures denied yesterday that he had "a morbid fascination with
death".
Anthony-Noel Kelly was responding to a question from his counsel,
Terry Munyard, at Southwark Crown Court. He said that was "completely
wrong", adding that his art was about the cycles of life and
"de-mystifying death". Kelly described his work as very important and
said he needed the human remains to explain "the pursuit of knowledge,
the pursuit of life".
Kelly, 42, a nephew of the Duke of Norfolk, was arrested and charged
with theft after exhibiting sculptures cast from a human head and
torso and other body parts taken from the Royal College of Surgeons.
Mr Munyard asked if he thought he was doing anything wrong by casting
the body parts. Kelly replied: "The question of wrong never came to my
mind."
He insisted that he had always treated the body pieces "with
respect". After use, he kept them in plastic bags at his studio
before burying them in a field next to his family's estate in Kent.
He stored a few human remains, including slices of arm in a
Tupperware box, at the home of an unwitting girlfriend.
Both he and Niel Lindsay, 25, a former technician at the RCS, who
also denies theft, told police they believed that the parts were
outside the three-year time limit allowed for dissection under the
Anatomy Act and no longer belonged to the college.
Kelly, from Clapham, south London, also denies handling stolen body
parts.
The case continues.
Heritage Lottery Fund chief in UKPounds:30m farewell (Daily Telegraph
London)
By Giles Worsley, Architecture Correspondent
LORD Rothschild, in his last official appearance as the chairman of
the Heritage Lottery Fund, announced a UKPounds:30 million boost by
the fund and English Heritage for decaying historical areas.
The chairman of the fund since it was launched in 1993, and the
chairman of its parent body, the National Heritage Memorial Fund since
1992, Lord Rothschild steps down today to be replaced by Eric
Anderson, the rector of Lincoln College, Oxford, who was Tony Blair's
headmaster at Fettes College.
Lord Rothschild, 61, transformed the fund into one of the most
powerful heritage and regeneration bodies in the country. He has seen
it grow from a seven-strong organisation giving out UKPounds:12
million a year to one giving out UKPounds:450 million annually with a
staff of 142. This has not been without friction with English
Heritage, whose chairman, Sir Jocelyn Stevens, has made little secret
of his belief that it should have been given responsibility for
lottery funds intended for the conservation of historical buildings.
Yesterday, however, such tensions were put aside when Lord Rothschild
and Philip Davies, English Heritage's regional director for London,
standing in for Sir Jocelyn, announced the body's second joint
conservation area partnership scheme, which will last for three years.
The fund has put in UKPounds:24 million and English Heritage
UKPounds:6 million. The grants, which will be matched by local
authorities, range from UKPounds:15,000 for the village of Bedlington
in Northumberland to UKPounds:1.39 million for North Tottenham in
north London. The aim is to boost the economy and vitality of the
areas by restoring groups of historic buildings. This is, however,
the last joint conservation area scheme between the fund and English
Heritage. In May the fund will announce its own townscape heritage
initiative. English Heritage and the fund will continue to co-operate
over their joint churches scheme, which is funded by the HLF and
administered by English Heritage. Lord Rothschild, who has been
heavily involved in heritage and the arts since 1985, first as the
chairman of the trustees of the National Gallery and subsequently at
the memorial fund and the lottery fund, said that he did not intend
to take on new commitments in the field, despite invitations. He
planned instead to concentrate on his family home, Waddesdon Manor in
Buckinghamshire, which is owned by the National Trust. However, he
said that he hoped to remain involved with Somerset House in London,
one of the causes dearest to his heart.
Arts centre wins UKPounds:7.5m lottery cash (Daily Telegraph London)
THE Centre for Contemporary Arts in Glasgow yesterday received the
largest single cash award ever given out by the Scottish Arts
Council.
The centre has received a UKPounds:7.5 million grant to extend and
redevelop its facilities in the city's Sauchiehall Street. The money
was among a number of National Lottery awards totalling UKPounds:11.8
million for arts facilities and activities throughout Scotland.
The Glasgow centre plans to use the award to create five performance
and exhibition areas, workshop facilities, retail units and a studio
flat for visiting artists. It also intends to extend the cafe, bar,
bookshop and administration areas.
Graham McKenzie, the centre's director, said: "We think it is going
to give us the facilities where we can be second to none in Europe,
and support the artist in Scotland into the next millennium."
The other main beneficiary yesterday was Tramway, the arts centre
owned by Glasgow City Council. Tramway plans to use its UKPounds:2.3
million award to extend its range of activities, and in particular to
work more closely with local schools and communities.
Liz Cameron, acting convenor of Arts and Culture, was delighted by
the awards. She said: "It is a great day for Glasgow, and I have to
say the Scottish Arts Council have shown their faith in what we can
do, which cannot be anything but great."
Magnus Linklater, chairman of the Scottish Arts Council, said it had
worked closely with Glasgow City Council when deciding the awards.
He said: "We are extremely pleased that the city council, which is in
very difficult times, continues to support the arts."
Other lottery awards included UKPounds:650,840 for a purpose-built
arts centre in Westburn Avenue, in Edinburgh's Wester Hailes
district, and UKPounds:181,349 to Dundee Rep's Community Drama
Department. The Highland and Islands received UKPounds:172,155 which
will be divided between three different projects.
Re: Lakota study ("The Performance of Temporary Protection
Assistants as an Adjunct to the Guard Force at the Hirshhorn
Museum"): Steve Keller IntlArtCop@aol.com
Roger:
Since the report you mention is(?) government property, perhaps you
ought to discuss its public release with someone other than Dave
Liston. It may be outdated but that is not for someone other than the
museum's current security director to decide. If it isn't government
property, I'm certain that whoever did the study with the permission
of the government(?) was under some sort of obligation to keep it
confidential and not distribute it. Just a thought
Steve Keller
In a message dated 3/28/98 2:32:00 AM, you wrote:
As an old museum-horse, I have some weird things in my library. One
of them is a copy (probably one of the only copies - don't know if
Dave Liston has one) of a Final Report/study done by Robert Lakota at
the Smithsonian entitled "The Performance of Temporary Protection
Assistants as an Adjunct to the Guard Force at the Hirshhorn Museum"
1975 and marked "administratively confidential." This document has a
bearing on the recent discussion of students guards on the list -
because these temporary assistants were half college graduates and
half were seniors in college. The report was generally favorable to
the function of these assistants - perhaps that's why its marked
confidential - it went against the feelings of the Director of SI
Guards at that time. If you are interested in the report, perhaps I
could talk Dave into mailing a copy - 65 pages is too much to fax and
I don't have a scanner to enter it into my computer.
missing Italian art (Teresa Prestwood writer5@hotmail.com)
I am attempting to research missing works of art. For example, I have
read an outdated account stating that at the time of publication,
there were still a total of 45,000 missing Italian art pieces. If you
could assist me by steering me in the direction of more recent
information and examples of specific works that are still missing, I
would much appreciate it. Perhaps even, some of this information
could be at your disposal. Thank you in advance for any assistance
that you may be able to provide me.
@@@
Moderator's reply: all MSN messages are archived at:
http://museum-security.org/
1997 we did send several messages about the looting and smuggling of
Italian art.
T.C.
@@@
Beijing's oldest stone statue of Buddha has been stolen from its home
in a suburban village (BBC UK News)
Police in the Chinese capital, Beijing, say the city's oldest stone
statue of Buddha has been stolen from its home in a suburban village.
A gang wielding crowbars reportedly took the statue, which is almost
1,500 years old. An official told the BBC the theft was a sign that
criminals involved in plundering China's art heritage are becoming
increasingly well organised. From Beijing, the BBC's Duncan Hewitt
reports: Beijing police quoted in China's daily newspaper, said the
1.65m statue of Buddha had remained safe and sound in a stone hut in a
village in the city's western suburbs since the year 499 AD Last
Tuesday, however, its 15th century residency was rudely interrupted
when a gang armed with crowbars prized it off its stone base and
dragged it away in the dead of night.
A local family had reportedly looked after the statue for the last
four generations. Police said they had recently warned them to improve
security after the statue was opened up to the public.
But an official with the Beijing Relics Protection Agency told the
BBC the theft appeared to have been well planned. He said the painted
statue, which dated back to the northern Wei dynasty was the oldest
stone image of Buddha in Beijing, and he said that those involved in
such thefts were becoming increasingly ruthless and well organised.
Officials have repeatedly warned that criminal gangs with networks
abroad pose a growing threat. The theft last year of a two-metre
Buddha weighing 750kg from a grotto in the central city of Luoyang was
evidence of their determination.
The authorities are pinning their hopes on a new database, tighter
controls on auctions, and improved international police co-operation,
but they acknowledge that the task of protecting China's art treasures
from unscrupulous collectors at home and abroad is a difficult one,
and is often made more difficult by the lax attitude of local
officials.
Partnership opportunities for Federally-associated collections
(Sally Shelton sshelton@sdnhm.org )
Please forward or post as appropriate.
Hi! This is a first review of the abstracts or program/workshop
proposals for the 1998 conference on Partnership Opportunities for
Federally-Associated Collections. For more information, if you did
not receive a flyer, please check the DOI web site at
http://www.doi.gov/pam/futcolco.html
The conference is shaping up very well and I am pleased with the
caliber of proposals and abstracts to date. All we need is more!
Never mind what the flyer says: spread the word that the deadline has
been extended to 15 May.
Here's an overview of what has been proposed to date.
Pre-conference workshops:
Collections management for archaeology collections (invitation only)
Creating repositories for archaeology and paleontology holdings from
Federal and other agencies
(co-sponsored by the San Diego Archaeological Center)
Keynote address: John Berry, DOI Assistant Secretary, Policy,
Management and Budget
Plenary addresses: Jason Hall, American Association of Museums
"Relationships between Federal Agencies and Museums Serving as
Repositories"
"Examples of Significant Museum-Federal Government Partnerships"
Sessions and talks:
White Mountain Apache Models for Intertribal Cooperation in NAGPRA
Preventive Conservation as a Strategy for the In-Perpetuity
Preservation of Federally-Associated Collections
The Internet, Communications Technology, and Collections: Web-based
Publication and Public Communication
When is the Information Enough? When is It Not?
Development of a Consistent Framework for Quality Control and Quality
Assurance in Fish Taxonomy Associated with Faunistic and Aquatic
Community Assessment
Department of Defense Archaeological Collections (two half-day
sessions)
The Internet, Communications Technology, and Collections
Biodiversity Value of Federal Collections (half-day session)
The Tennessee Valley Authority Historic Collection
Developing Exhibits from Federal Collections
US Army Ordnance Museum Restoration Project of Outdoor Ordnance
Collection
The schedule right now is as follows:
Monday-Tuesday, November 16-17: Preconference workshops (open as
well as agency-specific)
Sites: Mission Valley Marriott, San Diego Archeological Center,
various Balboa Park sites
Wednesday-Thursday, November 18-19: Keynote address and theme sessions
Site: Mission Valley Marriott
Friday: Plenary session, town hall discussion, and resolutions
Site: Balboa Park Club
Stay in touch and let everyone know that the program is still open
for contributions.
Cheers, Sally
Sally Y. Shelton
Director, Collections Care and Conservation
San Diego Natural History Museum, P. O. Box 1390
San Diego, CA 92112
phone (619) 232-3821, x226; FAX (619) 232-0248;
sshelton@sdnhm.org
http://www.sdnhm.org
From: "Michaele T. Haynes" mhaynes@lonestar.jpl.UTSA.EDU
Subject: Re: Volunteers and Security
On Mon, 30 Mar 1998, Robert T. Handy wrote:
Currently we do not open for evening
activities unless a staff person volunteers to be here (can't pay
overtime).
Bob,
I certainly hope these 'volunteers' are exempt from wages & hours
legislation. If not, they may not LEGALILY 'volunteer.' Gotta watch
that sort of stuff. Best.
Michaele and David Haynes mhaynes@lonestar.utsa.edu
From: Bill Mulligan bill.mulligan@MURRAYSTATE.EDU
Subject: Re: Volunteers and Security
At 11:23 PM 3/30/98 -0600, you wrote:
I certainly hope these 'volunteers' are exempt from wages & hours
legislation. If not, they may not LEGALILY 'volunteer.' Gotta watch
that sort of stuff. Best.
Yes, you always have to watch the legal details, but if the staff in
question are salaried and not paid by the hour, they can work more
than 40 hours without being paid extra. This may not be nice, but it
is legal and very common. I suspect most on the list would think of a
forty hour week as a short one. Both salaried and hourly staff can
receeve compensatory time off instead of overtime for work beyond
their usual amount. Also, if people truly volunteer (and this can be
slippery slope, I admit) they can pretty much do what they want with
their own time. Bill Mulligan
From: David Haberstich MAH0K06@SIVM.SI.EDU
Subject: Re: Volunteers and Security
I'm no lawyer, although that has never stopped me from debating legal
issues! It seems to me that it is unfair and unethical to expect an
unpaid volunteer to assume responsibility for safety and security in
such a situation without a regular, "official" staff member (paid or
unpaid) on the premises at the same time. Depending upon the
jurisdiction, I suspect that there might be some real problems of
legality and liability. --David Haberstich
From: "Sara P. Kelley" spkelley@LLPPTN.PALL.ORG
Re: Volunteers and Security
Bob,
Until I started here 2 1/2 years ago, our historic house museum was
only operated by volunteers. All my docents are still volunteers, and
they all have keys and know how to use the security code. I keep a
careful key list, and everyone has their own code, so I could keep
track of who is here when (in case something ever goes wrong). I
think our volunteers who *do* have access are more careful and caring
than those who don't.
Sara
Sara Phinney Kelley, Historic Site Administrator
Centre County Historical Society
State College, PA
(814) 234-4779 e-mail: spkelley@llpptn.pall.org
From: "Michaele T. Haynes" mhaynes@lonestar.jpl.UTSA.EDU
Subject: Re: Volunteers and Security
On Tue, 31 Mar 1998, Bill Mulligan wrote:
Yes, you always have to watch the legal details, but if the staff in
question are salaried and not paid by the hour, they can work more
than 40 hours without being paid extra. This may not be nice, but it
is legal and very common. I suspect most on the list would think of
a forty hour week as
Surely you are not suggesting that you can make your secretary work
for 50 hours a week and pay him only for 40. If you believe this is
legal, I think you are mistaken. Salaried vs. hourly has nothing to do
with it. The only employees working in museums who are exempt from
wages-and-hours regulations (that require compensation (in time or
money) at time-and-a-half for all hours worked over 40 in a week) are
those in 'bona fide executive, administrative, and professional'
positions. For definitions of these terms and a whole lot more about
these regulations, check the Department of Labor web page
www.dol.gov/dol/asp/public/programs/handbook/minwage.htm You have to
follow a few links to find what you are looking for, but it's pretty
intuitive. I can't find a regulation on volunteering by non-exempt
staff, but I remember a big problem several years ago after our public
TV station had one of its bi-weekly fund drives. The regular staff
'volunteered' to work very long hours as a donation to the station.
The Department of Labor was not amused, and, if I remember correctly,
assessed a large fine. Best.
Michaele and David Haynes mhaynes@lonestar.utsa.edu
From: "Robert T. Handy" handy@BCHM.ORG
Subject: Re: Volunteers and Security
David Haberstich wrote:
I'm no lawyer, although that has never stopped me from debating
legal
issues! It seems to me that it is unfair and unethical to expect an
unpaid volunteer to assume responsibility for safety and security in
such a situation without a regular, "official" staff member (paid or
unpaid) on the premises at the same time. Depending upon the
jurisdiction, I suspect that there might be some real problems of
legality and liability. --David Haberstich
You have articulated what I think is that "gut" feeling I still have.
I have talked to our District Attorney and he can't think of any legal
reason not to use volunteers. They can be fired just like staff.
They can be prosecuted for theft, just like staff. If a staff person
forgets to turn something off and the building burns down what more
could you do to that person than you could do to a volunteer?
Yet I still have that feeling that there's something wrong with using
a volunteer in the absence of a professional staff person. Maybe
that's the stuff ethics comes from.
Thanks
--
Bob Handy, Director
Brazoria County Historical Museum
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States announced plans Wednesday to
hold a conference Nov. 9-12 on art, insurance and other assets looted
by the Nazis from Holocaust victims.
The conference, to be held in Washington, would build on a meeting
last year in London and seek broad consensus for further action in
returning stolen assets to Holocaust survivors and their families,
Undersecretary of State Stuart Eizenstat and Miles Lerman, chairman of
the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Council, said in a statement.
The London conference, which focused mostly on gold looted by the
Nazis, called for establishment of a fund to provide relief to needy
survivors of Nazi persecution.
The United States also pledged to examine other Nazi-looted assets
and provide a more complete picture of the complex issues surrounding
them.
In their announcement, Eizenstat and Lerman said the Washington
conference ``will fulfill that pledge and will deepen international
research of the era, bringing together historians and other experts to
share information on Nazi misappropriation of artwork, insurance
policies and other assets.''
They also hoped the conference ``will act as a catalyst to help reach
consensus on further action and complete the unfinished business on
this issue'' by the end of the century.
A seminar will be held in Washington in June to organize the agenda
for the November conference.
As with the London conference, the Washington meeting was expected to
draw government officials from more than 40 countries, as well as
historians, experts and representatives of major nongovernmental
organizations, including those representing Holocaust survivors.
Organizers said it would aim to strengthen the international
commitment to open national archives and other records for research on
Nazi-looted assets as well as share the results of already-completed
scholarly work on the subject.
The announced dates for the conference followed an agreement last
week by Swiss banks to start negotiations with the World Jewish
Congress and lawyers for class-action plaintiffs on a global
settlement of claims emanating from the Holocaust.
Separately, a bipartisan group in Congress introduced legislation to
set up a U.S. presidential advisory commission on the collection and
disposal of Holocaust-era assets in the United States from 1933 to
1945.
``It is important that we know what art, gold, jewelry, bank accounts
and other valuables were taken from Holocaust victims and ended up in
the United States,'' Senate Banking Committee Chairman Alfonse D'Amato
said at a news conference. The New York Republican has been
instrumental in pressuring Swiss banks to search records for
Holocaust-era assets.
Speaking for the administration, Eizenstat endorsed the creation of
the commission and said it ``will further strengthen the moral
authority and diplomatic credibility of the United States ... on this
issue.''
The 23-member commission would include private citizens and lawmakers
and officials from of federal agencies. It would submit its report and
recommendations to the president and Congress by the end of 1999.
Jewish leaders are seeking compensation for assets of Holocaust
victims that were looted during the Second World War.
Last week's agreement, which Swiss officials stressed was far from an
actual settlement, averted for the time being the imposition of
sanctions on Swiss banks by state and local American officials.
The Clinton administration strongly opposes any boycott or sanctions
move, arguing that Switzerland has made good progress on the issue and
punitive action would be counterproductive.
Copyright 1998 Reuters Limited.
Tenant stole UKPounds: 1/2 m art from his flat (Times of London)
BY STEWART TENDLER, CRIME CORRESPONDENT
ARTWORKS and heirlooms worth UKPounds:500,000 have been taken from a
family's London home by a well-heeled young thief who rented their
flat and ransacked it. Police have begun circulating a list
throughout the art world of more than 50 stolen items. They believe
the thief was planning to empty the flat but fled as a cleaner
arrived.
Police said the victims are still recovering from the shock of losing
paintings, furniture and objets d'art held for generations. They
include seven paintings, an antique table, silver mounted boar tusks,
elephant tusks and a medal presented by the last Tsar.
Maria Dolores Swiderski, who is Spanish, and her Polish husband are
still counting the missing items. They have homes in Spain and Poland
and live in their South Kensington flat for six months of the year.
They had put the flat up for sale for UKPounds:400,000 when a local
letting agent was telephoned last month by a well-spoken young man,
who gave his name as "Oliver Thorn". He said that his parents were
coming from the United States for a funeral and wanted somewhere to
stay for a week. The thief met the agent in the street to see the
flat, which was the first property on the agent's list.
Mr Thorn was in his twenties, well-groomed and well-dressed, and
carried a mobile telephone. After seeing the flat, he announced that
he would take it for a week. He paid UKPounds:1,500 for the letting,
plus a deposit of UKPounds:1,500, and gave financial references.
Because the letting was for such a short period the agent did not ask
for any other references.
The thief was in the flat for almost a week. The day before he was
expected to leave, the cleaner rang to say that she wanted to do some
work the next day, but the young man asked her not to call. She
ignored him and let herself in to the third-floor flat to find various
packages left ready for collection, loud music playing, the curtains
closed and the bedroom doors shut.
Realising something was wrong, she called the police. Detective
Inspector Peter Johnstone said that he had never come across such a
theft. "It was audacious. We are looking for someone who has the nerve
to present themselves as a bona-fide tenant backed up by cash."
Master of all forgers (Tages Anzeiger, Zuerich, 02.04.98)
Rom, Monte Carlo, New York and now - Zuerich.
Daniele Ermes Dondé, who made forged masterpieces socially acceptable,
tonight opens a branch in Zuerich. by Esther Schmid "Please be quiet
for another 15 seconds" Signora Dondé orders those present, "TV wants
to film the Professore!" Ma certo. Professore Daniele Ermes Dondé, "
honorary doctor twice " as his Polish spouse does not get tired to
emphasize, strikes a pose in front of van Goghs "Bildnis von Dr.
Gachet". "E bene cosě?" he asks and imitates the position of the
portrait. Or does he come better as background of a Renoir, or should
he act as one of the dancers of Degas? No problem, the collection
which is presented at Beatengasse 4 also includes Manets, Monets,
Modiglianis, Gauguins as well as various van Goghs " definitly my
favourite artist" as the 51 years old Italian enthusiasticly exclaims.
The associated area of the "Museum Business Dondé" is not quite ideal.
Earlier he prefered the halls of posh hotels, in Zuerich he shares
the room out with the sales department of a bridesware-shop. But if
only the Dondé-Museum on Bahnhofstrasse will come into existing which
will happen in one to two years (a bank is very intersted) then the
outward appearance also will be allright. All paintings of the
collection assembled for Zuerich are kept to formats which are
compatible to flats and show well known and popular motives. A
certificate with picture and signature of Dondé marks it as 'handmade
single work, created by an artist who took into account the original
technique." Narrow minded to remark on the measures which are not
quite right and to find the motives sometimes a bit colourful. "At
home on the wall the paintings will be even more beautiful" the
Signora assures. After all those are "legal forgeries of artists who
had an university education", authorized by owners or museums where
the originals are exhibited and last not least had been handpicked by
Daniele Ermes Dondé.
Shiny Art
Il professore and spouse are in the art business since 14 years. Such
the high gloss brochure shows Arnold Schwarzenegger with van Gogh and
Dondé, Prinz Albert von Monaco with van Gogh and Dondé, Frank Sinatra
with van Gogh and Dondé and the couple Dondé on an audience with the
Pope who is said to have puchaised some Monets for the Vatican.
Umberto Tozzi, Toya Jackson, Sofia Loren, Roger Moore and members of
the Italian high nobility as well had themselves photographed with
Dondé and forgery. And yes, even Lady Di is supposed to have bought
but alas, there is no picture.
The beginning of the worldwide story of success - Rome, Monte Carlo,
Paris, New York, Gstaad, St. Moritz - was in Cremona, when Dondé, "who
descended of a family of art dealers" insists on having discovered a
forged de Chirico in his private collection. Instead to report to the
police or to denounce the fraud he started a search for the forger -
and from then on started to work with him. Se non č vero . . . In the
meantime 40 forgers in Cremona, Verona, Venedig und Florenz legally
work for lasting supplies: "Thanks to me those artists can come out of
the shadows of illegality", the honorary doctor explains his
engagement. He found his suppliers partly with the help of the police
force of Rome who are leading an European record of forgeries. The
artistic freedom of the artists is limited to the choise of the
painting which the want to copy but what is taken to the "Museum
Business Dondé" the Impresario himself decides alone. Impressionists,
van Gogh and Monet are selling all over the world, in Italy Modigliani
is selling quite a lot, in France Monet sells best, the Americans
prefer huge formats whereas the clientčle in Zuerich prefers
discreet, small formats and gouaches.
Forgery on order
The costs for a forgery which is certified by Dondé costs between
3000 and 8000 SF, but for that you also get the assurance the same
work will not be hanging in your nighbour's living room as well. Every
painting is sold just once. At least in Europe. "Into a collection for
Australia or America we possibly would take it in once more. Thank god
of a best seller like van Gogh's sunflower paintings the artist
himself already had created different versions. But even the art
lovers who cannot find anything within the current collection can be
helped thanks Dondé: "On order we stock exclusive art work of each
format and by every artist" the brochure promises. And with some luck
and with a preference for van Gogh one is even able to purchase a
genuine Dondé.
It's forged by the master himself.
Copyright © TA-Media AG
Deceased Collector Bestows Art Riches Upon National Gallery (Washington Post)
THE NETHERLANDS MY HAVE CLAIM ON VAN GOGH PAINTING.
@@@
Moderator's message:
The Dutch government in exile made up a law in 1940 that all art
transactions with the German occupier were illegal and that all art
that was subject of such transactions automatically became legally
part of the national collection. The Van Gogh selfportrait was sold
to the Germans during WW.II and hence automatically part of
confiscation. There is a very good chance the Dutch government will
claim the Van Gogh painting. Regarding the present USA/Austria
Schiele controversy it may be expected that the American legal system
will be able to cope with this problem according to the Dutch claims.
T.C.
@@@
WASHINGTON--The National Gallery of Art on Monday acquired a trove
of eight early-modern European master paintings, including a
self-portrait by Vincent van Gogh, from the estate of Betsey Cushing
Roosevelt Whitney, who died last week at 89. The paintings also
include a Toulouse-Lautrec, a Matisse, a Braque and a Dufy.
"The gift contains several masterpieces of almost unique
stature," said Earl A. Powell III, director of the gallery. He
officially learned of the bequest Monday from Whitney's attorney. "We
have great Toulouse-Lautrecs, but nothing like this. We have
Matisses, wonderful Matisses, but this sort of rounds it out."
Whitney, who in 1940 divorced James Roosevelt, son of President
Franklin D. Roosevelt, was the widow of publisher John Hay "Jock"
Whitney, a gallery trustee from 1961 to 1979. The couple's collection
is considered one of the most important of 19th and 20th century art;
they lent 73 works to the gallery in 1983 for a special exhibition.
In 1982 Jock Whitney gave the gallery eight American and French
paintings, as well as $2 million. In 1990, Betsey Whitney sold
Renoir's "At the Moulin de la Galette" for $78 million, then a record
price for Impressionist art. Over the years the Museum of Modern
Art in New York as well as the museum at Yale University were
beneficiaries of the Whitneys' generosity. The MoMA was notified
Monday, according to a museum official, that Whitney left it an early
self-portrait by Picasso, a Matisse, a Cezanne and a van Gogh, as
well as other paintings. "Self-Portrait," the National Gallery's
first van Gogh of that sort, brings its holdings of the popular
master up to nine. "With this van Gogh joining the 'White Roses' that
Ambassador [Pamela] Harriman gave, our presentation of the artist is
one of the best," said an obviously pleased Powell. The
painting, done in September 1889, will not be included in the highly
anticipated retrospective of the artist that opens at the gallery in
the fall. The legal paperwork usually takes awhile, Powell said.
The Toulouse-Lautrec, known as "Chilperic," is a portrait of the
actress Marcelle Lender, who played the Spanish bride of the French
king Chilperic in a popular comic operetta.
Murder of art restorer is linked to serial killer (Daily Telegraph
London April 3, 1998)
By Bruce Johnston in Rome
ITALIAN society was chilled yesterday by the news that yet another
cultivated pillar of the establishment had been battered to death by
a serial killer. Piero Nottiani, a 50-year-old art restorer, was
found on Wednesday by his estranged wife, bludgeoned to death in his
home in the Umbrian capital of Perugia. The circumstances of the death
and the victim are remarkably similar to a number of others in a
murder spree with a gay element. This includes the killings of an
art-dealing Venetian count (see Jan 18, 1997 report below. T.C.) , a
papal aide, a vicar in Milan and an American intellectual in Rome.
Mr Nottiani's body was rolled up in a rug and his head crushed by a
one-foot tall grey marble statuette of an ancient goddess. He was
chief restorer for Umbria's state heritage department, specialising
in Old Master paintings. Neighbours in the block of flats heard
nothing, suggesting that Mr Nottiani knew his killer.
Who murdered the count with a candelabra as he played Bach fugues?
(Jan. 18, 1997)
By Bruce Johnston
A FORMER head of Sotheby's has been found bludgeoned to death near
his piano after neighbours heard him playing fugues by Bach.
The body of Count Alvise di Robilant, 72, an art expert and music
scholar whose ancestors included seven Venetian Doges, was found by
his maid in his dressing gown in the sitting-room of his Renaissance
flat in Florence. Police said the count, who was divorced, had been
hit once on the forehead and three times on the back of the head with
a heavy object, possibly a candelabra.
Among the count's friends were Susanna Agnelli, the Fiat heiress and
former cabinet minister. He belonged to the Circolo dell'Unione, one
of Florence's smartest clubs, and was descended from the Mocenigo
family of Venice. One of the three Venetian palazzi formerly owned by
the family, Palazzo Mocenigo, on the Grand Canal, is where Lord Byron
lived while writing Don Juan.
Alvise's father sold all the palaces. His mother Gabriella, an
authoress who is 98, now lives in Sicily. Filippo di Robilant, one of
Alvise's three sons, works in Brussels with Emma Bonino, the EU
Commissioner.
The family also has a London branch: Carlo, Alvise's brother, is a
well-known City banker, and Carlo's son, Edmondo, is a Mayfair picture
dealer. Edmondo di Robilant is married to a television journalist,
Maya Even.
The victim lived alone on the converted top floors of the
15th-century palace of the noble Rucellai family to whom he was also
related, which is divided into flats. A local report said the count,
whose home was filled with paintings and objets d'art, had acquired
an "undesirable neighbour" - an East European prostitute - whom he
tried to have evicted.
Police said he was killed at about 10.30pm on Thursday. He probably
knew his attacker. He may have opened the door for him - or her, said
police, "given that the wounds are compatible with a female hand" -
and shown the killer inside. There was no sign of a break-in.
The count was described yesterday as "one of the handsomest men in
Italy" and, at 72, still attractive to women. "He was divorced from
his American wife, Betty, who lives in Rome and with whom he had three
sons and was on good terms," said a family friend.
The friend added that the count had been having "a sentimental life
with another woman, also of noble family". The couple's close circle
was "completely above suspicion", the friend said. "They belonged to a
sphere of people who were not only above board, but lacked the passion
needed for such a crime."
The count was managing director of Sotheby's in Italy, from 1980-86,
leaving when it transferred to Milan.
(for more information read February 9, 1997 report below)
Murder linked to art scandal (February 9, 1997)
By Jessica Taylor in Florence
FLORENTINE police, hunting the murderer of Count Alvise Nicolis Di
Robilant, have travelled to Venice to study the killing of another
aristocratic art expert almost three decades ago.
The secret trip to the lagoon city - and the excitable coverage of
the Di Robilant murder in the media - have only strengthened most
Italians' conviction that the art world is peopled by nobles who live
in palaces but occasionally fall into bad company. Now, after last
week's widely publicised allegations of art smuggling from Italy
(read on below February 8, 1997 report. T.C.) by Sotheby's staff, the
bad company that had long been assumed to exist within the demi-monde
of dealers, experts and art groupies is increasingly viewed by
Italians to be well established inside the international auction
houses themselves.
The striking similarities between the bludgeoning to death last month
of Di Robilant, once a director of Sotheby's Italia, and the murder of
Count Filippo Giordano delle Lanze 27 years ago have intrigued
Italians.
Both were blue-blooded experts on art and antiquities. Both were
married, separated and living alone; both were killed in their 15th
century palazzi by multiple blows from blunt objects. Both were found
half-naked, one with a favourite painting at his side, the other with
a favourite painting, slashed, nearby.
Were it not for the decades separating the crimes, the series of
coincidences would seem too much to ignore. As it is, the fact that
police have chosen to reopen the Delle Lanze file is being seen more
as an example of their desperation for leads than likely to produce
answers to the Di Robilant killing. In the absence of a suspect, the
Italian newspapers have lingered over the count's pedigree. They have
portrayed him as an urbane, piano-playing, jet-setting dandy, listed
his alleged female conquests and catalogued his extensive art
collection. Di Robilant's sons were quick to contradict this
description, describing their father as a mild-mannered man of simple
tastes.
Initial speculation that a spurned mistress, seeking revenge, had
murdered the count was scotched by a pathologist's report which found
that the blows were too deep, and had rained down from too high an
angle, to have been inflicted by a woman. That opened up a whole new
line of inquiry - in the media at least. Investigators were soon
reported to be researching Di Robilant's male friends. The sly
suggestion that he might have been bisexual was apparently borne out
by the parallels with the case of Delle Lanze, whose male lover was
convicted of his murder, but fled before be could be imprisoned, and
has not been heard of since.
While they dusted down the details of the Delle Lanze case,
investigators were also believed to have used their excursion to
Venice to learn more about the new acquaintances Di Robilant made
during his own recent visits to the city.
His last project had been editing a huge collection of 18th century
letters written by a Venetian nobleman and his Anglo-Venetian lover.
The manuscript, complete with Di Robilant's own account of Venetian
life at the time the letters were written, was to have been handed
over to the publishers at the end of this year.
Di Robilant may have been a relative newcomer to social life in
Venice. But he was a genuine connoisseur, completely immersed in the
world of Italian art and antiquities. The country claims to house one
third of the world's artistic heritage, an inheritance of which it is
proud if somewhat careless. Few Italians are willing to admit that
their treasures are bought and sold by dealers who are a far cry from
the refined, principled image projected by Di Robilant and his kind.
Art smuggling is now organised crime's third-biggest money-spinner
after drugs and weapons. Corruption in the sector is rife, and
suspicious deaths are not infrequent. According to Vittorio Sgarbi,
the art historian and MP, "the art world is dishonest". But he put the
blame firmly on Italian law which bans the export of important art
works. "The law suffocates the art market in this country, so it finds
an outlet elsewhere", he said. "It is hardly surprising there is a
strong criminal element."
According to Gen Roberto Conforti, the head of the Italian police's
fine arts squad, it is "quite possible" that Di Robilant died at the
hands of an art world habitué. Mr Sgarbi goes even further. "It
wouldn't surprise me at all. It's very probable. Even the most
legitimate art dealer works on the basis of percentages, which go to
various intermediaries at various points of the sale," he said. "If
the wrong intermediary is unhappy with his percentage, anything can
happen."
Painting at the centre of smuggling claim returned (February 8, 1997)
By Bruce Johnston in Rome
AN Italian painting that was allegedly smuggled into Britain by a
Milan-based employee of Sotheby's was returned to Italy yesterday
and handed over to Carabinieri.
The Carabinieri said that the smuggling allegations, made in a
Channel 4 Dispatch documentary on Thursday, were at the centre of a
special investigation that had been opened by magistrates in Rome.
Gen Roberto Conforti, head of the Carabinieri unit that specialises
in the recovery of stolen and illegally exported works of art, said
the painting, Portrait of an Old Lady with a Cup, by Giuseppe Nogari,
was now under lock and key.
"The matter is now in the hands of investigating magistrates in
Rome," Gen Conforti said, noting that the painting was "a nice 18th
century picture that is typical of the period, but no museum piece".
He added: "Undoubtedly, such an investigation, if necessary, may need
to take a hard look at the operations of this firm in general."
Sotheby's was still the subject of a storm of adverse publicity at
its Mayfair headquarters yesterday but defiantly announced that its
investigation was going forward "at our own pace and not at a pace
which may suit anybody else".
security devices opinions requested (Michael P Crimmins
mpc584@world.std.com)
I work for a start up company in Massachusetts.
We are looking into developing a remote detection automatic contact
"smart" system. we are thinking of aiming at a low cost solution for
area that need some monitoring but cannot afford a security force.
ideally the system would have redundant sensors that would eliminate
false alarms. ideally the system would also be able to modem the watch
officer of the night. I would like to get some feedback from you. 1.
Is there a need for a low cost system such as I have described? I have
been reading on this list about thefts from historical houses and
cemeteries etc. It seems to me that this would be useful. This is not
an effort to sell such a system or secure funding for it. I am only
asking for the opinions of people in the field.
Thank you
Mike Crimmins
Duke-River Engineering
mpc584@world.std.com
30 Ossipee Rd. Newton Massachusetts 02164-9101
PO box 9101
Forwarded by: Roger Wulff museplan@erols.com
Renumeration of Security/Front of House Staff (Trevor Reynolds trevor@CAERLAS.DEMON.CO.UK)
I am currently involved in costing up a proposal for a new
museum/visitor centre and I am trying to gather some comparative data
on the rates of pay etc. for front of house staff. A would be
grateful for any information any of you can give me (especially those
from England) The information I am looking for is as follows:
Job Title
Which of the following tasks are undertaken:
Exhibition invigilation; Ticket sales; Shop Sales; Cleaning;
Recruitment to membership organisations/friends; Supervising other
staff; First Aid; Site safety; opening & closing the site; giving
visitors information about the exhibits; guided tours Normal Basic
salary -- for a full time employee for a year (if there is a pay scale
the minimum & maximum would be useful as well as the average) How many
weekends are they expected to work during a year? Do they get any
extra money for working at weekends? (and how much?) How many days
paid holiday do they get in a year? Approximately how many staff of
this type do you have at your institution? In which city/town is your
institution located? And finally (if you don't mind telling me) what
is the name of your institution?
If you can only provide me with only some of the above information I
would still be grateful. Please respond by email.
Trevor Reynolds
From: "Ton Cremers" securma@xs4all.nl
To: "Museum Security Mailinglist" securma@xs4all.nl
Date sent: Fri, 3 Apr 1998 22:25:16 +0000
Subject: a painful matter
Send reply to: "Museum Security Mailinglist" securma@xs4all.nl
a painful matter
The Museum Security Network, mailinglist and website has been on
line now for 16 months. We have some 500 subscribers. The website
receives 2500 visitors per month. In 1997 we sent over 500 pages of
information. 1998 has shown a steadily growth. As you will know the
MSN is a non profit endeavor totally based on private time and
money. At the moment we reached the point to decide to continue and
find ourselves some financial support or stop. We do not ask our
subscribers for money and do not intend to do so in the future. The
only help we need now is in finding a sponsor who is willing to
invest some $ 5000 per year to keep us going. Recently two new
computers were bought (a desktop and a notebook to keep things
going while not at home or at the office) We have two ISPs (one in
the USA and one in Europe). Let alone the everrrrr growing phone
bill! Do send us your suggestions.
Thanks,
Ton Cremers
Smart System (IntlArtCop IntlArtCop@aol.com)
In a message dated 4/3/98 5:06:38 AM, you wrote:
We are looking into developing a remote detection automatic
contact "smart" system. we are thinking of aiming at a low cost
solution for area that need some monitoring but cannot afford a
security force. ideally the system would have redundant sensors that
would eliminate false alarms. ideally the system would also be able to
modem the watch officer of the night. I would like to get some
feedback from you. 1. Is there a need for a low cost system such as I
have described? I have been reading on this list about thefts from
historical houses and cemeteries etc. It seems to me that this would
be useful. This is not an effort to sell such a system or secure
funding for it. I am only asking for the opinions of people in the
field.
Mike:
How does this system differ from a burglar alarm system? I need more
information to reply.
Steve Keller
Artist is jailed over theft of body parts (Daily Telegraph, Sue
Clough, Courts Correspondent)
Boasting about corpses led to sculptor's fall
AN "obsessed" artist, who used human body parts stolen from the Royal
College of Surgeons to cast macabre sculptures, was jailed for nine
months yesterday. Anthony-Noel Kelly, 42, a nephew of the Duke of
Norfolk, was convicted of stealing remains including three heads,
part of a brain, six arms, 10 legs and feet and sections of three
torsos. Judge Geoffrey Rivlin told him: "The offence was a revolting
one and an affront to every reasonable and decent concept of human
behaviour." The judge said he was not sentencing Kelly for his art.
"In this country we pride ourselves on free artistic expression. I
sentence you for a very serious theft." Niel Lindsay, 25, a former RCS
technician, was also convicted of theft and jailed for six months
suspended for two years. Judge Rivlin said both had done "great
harm" to the RCS and the donation of bodies. There is concern in
medical circles that the activities of Kelly and Lindsay may deter
would-be donors. This was the major fear of Dr Laurence Martin, HM
Inspector of Anatomy, who called in police when he realised the
sculptures covered in silver and gold and exhibited by Kelly at a
contemporary arts fair had been cast from real human remains. A
Department of Health spokesman said that 700 to 800 bodies a year
were accepted by medical schools for teaching, study and research
and "there is great concern that publicity about this case might
cause people to reconsider". A spokesman for the RCS, an
internationally renowned training centre, said: "It is essential for
this vital work that the college has access to human material
willingly donated by members of the public. The college has treated
and continues to treat human remains with the utmost dignity and
respect." Kelly never denied using the remains for his work but
claimed that he had always treated them with respect. This was far
from true, said the judge. The parts were manipulated into rucksacks,
smuggled out of the RCS, transported across London by Tube and taxi
and left for months in black plastic sacks. One leg, nicknamed
Hopalong, was kept in a tower room at his family's estate in Kent.
Other bits were stored in a Tupperware box at the home of an
unwitting girlfriend. Eventually, Kelly buried some 40 parts in an
unmarked grave in a field. The trial made legal history because it is
the first time anyone has been charged with stealing a body or its
parts. For centuries it has been a tenet of English common law that a
body is not property because it does not belong to anyone and
therefore cannot be stolen. But after legal argument and studying
authorities dating back to the 17th Century, the judge decided that
once "skilled work" had been done, in this case dissection, body
parts became property and could be stolen. In his landmark ruling,
destined to be tested in the Court of Appeal, Judge Rivlin became the
first judge ever in a criminal case to have to decide on the property
rights of a body. In the past, those who raided graveyards and
disinterred bodies could be charged only with stealing the coffin or
winding sheet around the corpse but not the body itself. After the
most notorious of all, William Burke, was hanged in 1829 for
murdering at least 15 people with his partner William Hare, to sell
their corpses for dissection, the Anatomy Act of 1832 was passed to
allay public concern and outrage at such activities. Kelly and
Lindsay claimed the remains had been kept by the RCS for longer than
the three years normally allowed under the act. Therefore the college
no longer owned them and they had not stolen them. The court was told
that Kelly was introduced to the RCS by its senior vice-president, a
surgeon who described him as "a very talented young artist,
particularly interested in doing a 20th-century Leonardo da Vinci. He
has spent many, many hours in my operating theatre, in mortuaries and
abattoirs. There is no doubt he is a very serious medical artist."
Because of this Kelly, of Clapham, south London, was allowed
unprecedented access. He became friends with Lindsay, of Stoke
Newington, north London, a lowly-paid technician, and persuaded him
to smuggle out the remains, paying UKPounds:400. Kelly told the jury
of his fascination "with the shapes and cycles of life". From organic
matter he progressed to animal parts and embalmed his own shire
horses, using his skills as a trained butcher and abattoir worker,
and from there moved to real cadavers. He denied that he had "a
morbid fascination with death". He said his work was about
"demystifying death". It was very important and he needed the human
remains to explain "the pursuit of knowledge, the pursuit of life".
But even after his conviction, Kelly was reluctant to hand back the
moulds and casts. Terry Munyard, his counsel, said he had an
"obsession" with them and wanted to keep them because of his
"devotion to, fascination and involvement with the work he did". It
was only after long discussions with his lawyers that Kelly agreed to
hand them back to the RCS. Judge Rivlin granted both men leave to
appeal but refused bail for Kelly.
Customs officials pluck art at border (By Diane R. Stepp, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution)
A display of Amazonian artifacts bound for Kennesaw State University
has been stopped at the U.S. border by customs officials who suspect
that decorative feathers were plucked from endangered species of
South American birds, according to the college. The "Secrets of
Amazonia" exhibit, which was to have opened Thursday, includes
multi-colored necklaces, feathered headdresses, crowns and armbands
that rain forest natives use to express their cultures and bonds with
the forest, said KSU Art Gallery Director Roberta Griffin. U.S.
government officials say they don't know where the exhibit is being
held up, but it had just completed a year-long run in Quebec City,
Canada. Griffin said the museum is working with international
customs brokers and the U. S. Department of Fish and Wildlife to
complete authorization to import the objects temporarily. "We've been
told that should be around mid-April," said Hillary Wagy of KSU's
department of continuing education. The show was to run through April
28, but that may now be extended. The exhibit was collected by Aldo
Lo Curto, a traveling volunteer physician who works in Amazonia for
six months each year. The plastic surgeon has worked as a volunteer
in developing countries since 1978. He is scheduled to lecture about
the art collection on April 28 at the college.
Claims to Greek goddesses; Italy suspects smugglers got artifacts to
US collector (Walter V. Robinson, Globe Staff, 04/04/98)
IDONE, Italy - New York diamond merchant Maurice Tempelsman received
condolence notes from all over the world when his companion,
Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis, died in 1994. But none contained as
singular a request as the handwritten letter from first- and
third-graders in this small mountain town in central Sicily. In
Onassis' memory, the children implored Tempelsman to return to Aidone
the 2,500-year-old marble heads, hands, and feet of the Greek
goddesses Demeter and Persephone. The artifacts were allegedly
plundered by grave robbers in 1979 from the nearby ancient Greek
city-state of Morgantina, then smuggled out of Sicily to a London
dealer, Robin Symes, who later sold them to Tempelsman for more than
$1 million. The children, however, received the same reply sent to
his other well-wishers, a preprinted card saying: ''Mr. Maurice
Tempelsman acknowledges with grateful appreciation your kind
expression of sympathy.'' But now Italy's government is preparing what
is certain to be a high profile lawsuit to force him to return the
priceless antiquities to central Sicily, where a Greek civilization
flourished for more than 300 years before Roman legions overran
Morgantina in 211 BC. Last year, Tempelsman rebuffed an entreaty by
the Italian Foreign Ministry that he return the artifacts, according
to government officials. Tempelsman, who accompanied President
Clinton to South Africa last week, did not respond to several
requests for an interview. But yesterday, an aide at his New York
office released a brief statement saying the Italian government has
never contacted Tempelsman and that he purchased the marble artifacts
in 1978 - the year before the Italians say they were excavated. After
the Globe asked for documentation of the purchase, however,
Tempelsman acknowledged late yesterday through the aide that the
purchase was made in 1980, not 1978. A spokesman for Symes, the
London antiquities dealer who handled the sale and who has figured
publicly in other cases involving looted artifacts, said Symes does
not discuss his business with reporters. In the wake of a recent US
federal court decision, the Tempelsman case is likely to further
alarm antiquities dealers and collectors, and even American museums
that sometimes sidestep ethics codes by acquiring artifacts that have
been illegally removed from countries like Italy. That decision,
which has been appealed, ordered the return of a gold platter that
New York collector Michael Steinhardt bought for $1.2 million after
it was plundered from another archeological site in Sicily. With its
porous borders, hundreds of unexplored ancient sites and minimal
government spending on archeological preservation, Italy's network of
looters and smugglers has long supplied outside dealers and wealthy
collectors with everything from 2,500-year-old Greek vases to pieces
of ancient columns hacked off tomb entrances. ''We cannot just blame
outsiders,'' Judge Silvio Raffiotta, the provincial magistrate in
central Sicily who has prepared much of the evidence in the
Tempelsman case, said in an interview. ''One cannot just say it's the
thief's fault if we've always left the door open. We have made it too
easy for the thieves, the dealers, and the collectors and museums
that acquire the loot, and that must change.'' Though there are
estimates that up to 80 percent of antiquities on the market have
been illegally exported from their country of origin, Raffiotta said
there is no evidence Tempelsman knew when he bought the two marble
heads, three feet, and three hands that they had been stolen. Indeed,
as lawyers who represent collectors and museums point out, countries
that seek the return of stolen archeological items often have trouble
proving the crime occurred within their borders, much less whether
the looting took place after the country passed laws to outlaw such
plunder. In Italy, excavating or exporting such artifacts without
government permission has been illegal since 1939. But in Sicily,
Raffiotta said, American archeologists who have worked at the
Morgantina site since a Princeton University team discovered it in
1955 have historical proof that the partial statues, called
acroliths, probably came from that location. What's more, he said,
he has a witness's account of the 1979 excavation of the pieces by a
band of nighttime looters called ''clandestini.'' The two goddesses,
Demeter and her daughter by Zeus, Persephone, were two of the
greatest Olympian deities, and the cult to them was deeply rooted in
Morgantina. Only the marble head, hands, and feet of the statues
survive because in antiquity, the bodies of many statues were made of
limestone and sometimes even wood that disintegrated over time. They
are the only known acroliths of that style in the world. The
availability of metal detectors in recent decades has led to the
plundering of much of the metal, silverware, and coins buried by the
Greeks when the Roman assault began in 211 BC. But Raffiotta said
the acroliths, which date from about 525 BC, are of extraordinary
value because they are important evidence of early Greek colonization
of Sicily. ''These acroliths represent the faces of the origin of the
Sicilians, these two heads with their profound eyes,'' said
Raffiotta, who has written two books about Morgantina. ''These heads
are our primordial divinity.'' Raffiotta first made a claim for the
acroliths when they cropped up publicly for the first time, on
exhibition in 1988 at the Getty Museum in Malibu, California. But the
Getty quickly returned the artifacts to the anonymous collector who
had loaned them. Interpol, at the request of the Italian government,
made a brief inquiry. But for reasons that remain unclear, no action
was taken. In an interview here, and during a tour of Morgantina's
painstakingly excavated central square, with its commanding hilltop
views of Mt. Etna and the Mediterranean 30 miles to the east,
Raffiotta said the leader of the plunderers who found the acroliths
has given an account of what happened. Giusseppe Mascara, who has
served prison sentences for his longtime role as an organizer of
looting at the site, has told investigators that he saw the
extraordinary marble figures the night they were found in 1979,
according to Raffiotta. The two men who found and removed the
artifacts were paid the equivalent of about $1,100 for their night's
work, a tiny fraction of the profits made by the smugglers and
dealers who completed the chain to Tempelsman. The acroliths were
smuggled into Switzerland, where, according to the Italian
investigation, Symes bought them directly from the middleman for the
''clandestini.'' There is other evidence to buttress the claim,
according to Malcolm Bell, a University of Virginia archeologist who
has led annual excavation work here for almost two decades. Bell said
he heard talk among local residents during that summer of 1979 that
the ''clandestini'' had uncovered marble sculptures of the female
heads. He added that a subsequent examination of the site pinpointed
by Mascara, a sanctuary, turned up evidence that it had been
dedicated to Demeter and Persephone. Tempelsman, who has made a
fortune in the wholesale diamond business, Leon Tempelsman & Son,
that his father started, is not among the best-known of American art
collectors. Nor was he in the public eye until he was identified as
Onassis' frequent escort during the 1980s, and then as her constant
companion when she was dying of cancer. Indeed, it was his public
association with Onassis during her illness that first brought him to
the attention of Aidone's schoolchildren and their teachers. During
the final stages of Onassis' illness, and again just after her death,
the students wrote letters to Tempelsman asking for the return of the
artifacts. The second letter attracted brief mention in some Italian
newspapers. Rosalia Raffiotta (no relation to Judge Raffiotta), one
of the teachers who organized the letter-writing in 1994, recalled in
an interview how excited they were to receive a reply from Tempelsman
after the second letter. But when they read the card, she said,
''there was great disappointment. The children, though they have
grown older, still talk about this with great passion and anger.'' If
nothing else, the Tempelsman case underscores the risks that buyers-
often knowingly - take in the swashbuckling international trade in
antiquities. Even if Tempelsman prevails legally, antiquities
experts say that the acroliths are likely to become so tainted that
he would be unable to sell them or give them to a museum. Judge
Raffiotta said Italians would be overjoyed if Tempelsman would return
the artifacts voluntarily: ''Americans would better understand this
if an Italian collector had such important documents belonging to
George Washington, or perhaps Thomas Jefferson's draft of the
Declaration of Independence.''
Austria Confronts Its Shameful Past; Reality of Collaboration With
Nazis Replaces Myth of Victimization (By William Drozdiak Washington
Post Foreign Service Saturday, April 4, 1998)
VIENNA-Sixty years after the Nazis marched into Austria and were
treated as conquering heroes by wildly cheering crowds, a dramatic
transformation is taking place in the way this nation of 8 million
people looks at one of the most sordid chapters in its long history.
History books have been rewritten so that students can learn that
Austria was not just the first victim of Nazi aggression -- as it
long pretended -- but rather behaved in many respects as an ardent
sympathizer and active collaborator in the diabolical aims of its
native son Adolf Hitler. In contrast to former president Kurt
Waldheim, who for many years covered up his involvement in wartime
atrocities, Austria's leaders now speak with striking candor about
the fact that many compatriots were linked to Nazi crimes and that
the rampant antisemitism that culminated in the Holocaust found
fertile soil here. More than a half-century after the war, Germany's
neighbors are still struggling to cope with their legacy of
collaboration with the Nazi regime. The ascendancy of a generation
born after the war and the release of documents kept secret during
the Cold War have done much to erode myths of resistance and states
of denial that persisted throughout much of Europe. France's trial of
Maurice Papon, which concluded Thursday with the French wartime
official's conviction of complicity in crimes against humanity, cast
new light on the extent to which many French civil servants,
including former president Francois Mitterrand, cooperated with the
Nazi occupation. Switzerland has been forced to acknowledge that it
was spared not because of a plucky army guarding its Alpine redoubt
but because it provided useful financial services to the Nazis. During
ceremonies last month marking the 60th anniversary of the Anschluss,
or annexation to Nazi Germany, Austrian Chancellor Viktor Klima
emphasized that the time was long overdue "for an open and critical
debate so that Austria can draw the right lessons about its past." He
said it was "a long and painful process" to confess Austria's shared
responsibility for Nazi crimes. But Klima insisted Austrians could no
longer justify old myths about being overwhelmed by a foreign power.
He noted that 700,000 Austrians were Nazi party members, that many
held leading positions in the hierarchy and were guilty of complicity
in crimes against humanity. President Thomas Klestil, Waldheim's
successor, also stressed the need to deal squarely with the Nazi
past and to do whatever is possible to make amends to the victims,
especially members of Austria's once-thriving Jewish community who
were exterminated or deported. Klestil lamented that "those who were
expelled then were invited much too late, and unconvincingly, to
return home." He said that while serving as ambassador to the United
States in the 1980s he felt a particular shame in meeting Austrian
Jews who lost their homes and belongings during the Nazi occupation
from 1938 to 1945. "I know how deeply they loved their old home
country despite all that happened," Klestil said. "They would have
had a right to experience Austria's rebirth, and I know that their
contributions to our democracy and culture could have been
invaluable." Austria's changing assessment of its historical
culpability has gone beyond words. After two paintings by Egon Schiele
loaned by Austria for a recent show in New York were seized because
it was suspected they had belonged to Holocaust victims, Education
and Culture Minister Elisabeth Gehrer declared that "immoral
decisions" dating to the war must be rectified. Gehrer ordered that
once provenance is certified, all national art works confiscated by
the Nazis would be returned to their rightful owners -- a decision
that experts believe will strip more than 100 masterpieces from
Vienna's leading museums. "It's just the right thing to do," Gehrer
said in an interview. "I know it's a shame that it took so many
years. We can't change history, but we can correct our mistakes.
That's what this learning process is all about." Austria announced
last week it would resume cooperation with U.S. agents in the hunt
for Nazi criminals. The deal revived an accord suspended in 1990 when
Waldheim was barred from the United States, a step taken after the
Justice Department concluded that as a lieutenant in the German army
in the Balkans, Waldheim helped the Nazi SS deport prisoners to slave
labor or death camps. "This accord symbolically ends the Waldheim
affair complex and marks the emergence of a new Austria, which we
hail," said Elan Steinberg, executive director of the World Jewish
Congress in New York. School textbooks, which for decades nourished
the myth that Austrians were the Nazis' first victims and suppressed
the notion of any national guilt, have been rewritten to emphasize
the direct complicity of many Austrians in the Nazi party and Nazi
crimes. Vienna's mayor has decreed that the Steven Spielberg film
"Schindler's List" will be required viewing for all schoolchildren in
the city. Klima acknowledged in an interview that the avalanche of
foreign criticism during Waldheim's presidency from 1986 to 1992 was
an agonizing and humiliating ordeal -- one that made Austrians at
times feel they belonged to a pariah state. Once Waldheim left office,
Klima's predecessor, Franz Vranitzky, moved quickly on many fronts
to refurbish the nation's image and revise Austria's view of history
so that it reflected painful truths about widespread Nazi
sympathies. As the first Austrian leader born after the war, Klima,
50, says he feels a special moral duty to sustain that legacy. "It's
very difficult and makes many people angry and uncomfortable, but we
must face up to the past however awful it may be so we can be sure
never to commit the same mistakes in the future," Klima said. "And we
have to put this process to work in the form of actions and not just
words." Klima says the need to confront the truth about the fascist
era is not just a matter of coming to terms with history. He
believes it also holds special political relevance for today's
Austria. The Freedom Party led by Joerg Haider has emerged as the
biggest far-right movement in Europe and captured 28 percent of the
votes in elections to the European Parliament last year. Haider has
already staked his claim to replace Klima as Austria's next head of
government after national elections are held next year. Haider rejects
any comparisons to Nazi or fascist forebears and insists he is a
democratic populist who wants to break the stranglehold on politics
held by Klima's Social Democrats and their conservative partners, the
People's Party. Nonetheless, he has lived up to his right-wing
reputation by publicly praising the employment policies of the Nazi
regime and waging a xenophobic campaign to expel foreign workers. "We
must always be vigilant in fighting against racism, fanaticism or
indifference," Klima said. "Given the nature of our past, we must
never forget how people can be misled by populist demagogues."
Re: a painful matter, ICOM/ICMS (antonia.kriks@munich.netsurf.de)
Open question
As far as I understand ICOM (International Council of Museums) is an
International Organization which is concerned not just with museum
security but with wide spread questions which are connected with
museums. According to Mr. Günther Dembski, Memeber of ICOM,
Chairperson of ICMS and Security advisor of Austrian Federal Museums,
there is also a suborganization ICMS which especially looks after
matters of security in museums. May I quote Mr. Dembski; he wrote in
Study Series of ICMS Nr.4: "As you can see, ICMS is an International
ICOM Committee that is dedicated to life and it's problems. It is an
international committee of interest and importance to all ICOM members
who wish to save and protect our cultural heritage: security should be
everybody's business." Being a journalist of wide spread interests I
also learned that ICOM is having annual meetings in different parts of
the world like Israel, Berlin, next autumn in Australia. I also
learned that ICOM has a homepage on the Internet and I visited it once
and that's it. I came across MSM and I became a subscriber immediately
because it really offers wide spread information about museums and it
is a very important and singular source of information, opinion and
news, therefore MSM does exactly what Mr. Dembsky was talking about.
May I put it this way: Why is it not possible to use some money (which
obviously exists in the cash register of ICOM otherwise all those
expensive meetings all over the world could not be hold) and the
experience and knowledge of the people from the Rijksmuseum Amsterdam,
especially of Ton Cremers, to go on with the excellent service which
they started by implementing MSM on the Internet? It should be
possible to finance an endeavour like this without using Ton Cremers'
ability to exploite himself all the time. To cut the long story short:
Why does ICOM not give some money to MSM and let Ton Cremers go on
wiht his excellent work he is providing for the benefits of all of us?
Antonia Kriks
(WDR-Westdeutscher Rundfunk, DLF-Deutschlandfunk, BR, SWF, RB)
(Abbreviated message, forwarded from Museum-L)
1998 NM Heritage Preservation Week Calendar of events
See SASIG Message http://www.swanet.org/discussion/98/126.html or the
SWA home page http://www.swanet.org/ to view this announcement as a
40K PDF file -- SASIG Ed.
NEW MEXICO HERITAGE PRESERVATION WEEK CALENDAR OF EVENTS
MAY 9-17, 1998
Four hundred years ago this year, a small, rather insignificant event
began a chain of events that forever altered the history, culture,
architecture, and way of life of what is now New Mexico. A tiny group
of settlers arrived at two Indian villages on the Rio Grande called,
in the Tewa language, yúngé and ohke·. The Spanish settlers called the
former San Gabriel and took up residence there. They called the latter
San Juan, and the Tewa-speaking people of both villages lived there.
From this simple beginning, two ancient cultural traditions began a
centuries-long process of adapting and adjusting to one another's
ways. Sometimes this process held mutual advantages, sometimes it led
to conflict and suffering. As generations passed and other cultural
traditions were added into the mixture, this process of adaptation and
interaction gave rise to the unique culture of New Mexico.
Throughout these past 400 years, the experiences of our people have
shaped and been shaped by the historic buildings and communities, the
very landscapes of our state. By preserving the places associated with
our history, we preserve a tangible link to the heritage of this state
for all of us and for those yet to come. Please join us in celebrating
our history by participating in New Mexico Heritage Preservation Week.
All of the events listed in this calendar are organized and staffed by
volunteers who would like to share with you their enthusiasm for the
history and prehistory of New Mexico. Please bring your family and
friends and enjoy these fascinating, fun, and informative events.
Lynne Sebastian
State Historic Preservation Officer
The Historic Preservation Division wishes to thank the many
organizations and individuals who volunteered their time to organize
and carry out the events listed in this calendar. In honor of the
400th anniversary of the founding of New Mexico, the Quartocentenario,
this year's Heritage Preservation Week poster features a view of the
interior of the San Jose de Gracia Church, built in 1776. Both the
church and its collections have been designated a National Historic
Landmark and still serve the village of Las Trampas. Posters are
available free of charge while supplies last. For a poster or
additional information about Heritage Preservation Week, please call
the Division at (505) 827-6320.
It is the mission of the Historic Preservation Division to ensure that
our remarkable heritage is preserved and passed on to future
generations. This is accomplished through a variety of means including
public outreach, registration of properties for the National Register
of Historic Places and the State Register of Cultural Properties,
administration of preservation grants and loans, provision of
technical assistance to government agencies and owners of historic
properties, and maintenance of information on historic and prehistoric
sites in New Mexico. For more information about our programs or to
receive our newsletter, New Mexico Preservation, please call (505)
827-6320.
Archaeology, Anthropology and History of the American Southwest
Southwestern Archaeology (SWA) -- got caliche??
http://www.swanet.org/
telnet://aztec2.asu.edu
Brian W. Kenny; P.O. Box 61203 Phoenix AZ 85082-1203;
kenny@getnet.com; (602) 227-3154 voice msg pager
Disaster recovery and natural history collections (ConsDisList:
sshelton@sdnhm.org)
Andrea Maierhoffer amaierho@dlcwest.com writest
I am a conservation intern putting together a disaster recovery plan
for natural history collections ... I have found several articles
that describe in adequate detail how to treat library and archival
collections but almost nothing about natural history collections.
I'm not sure why natural history collections should be treated
differently in a disaster plan from any other type of object
collection (with a couple of exceptions listed below). Let me weigh in
with one caveat: any disaster plan that focuses first on collections
and not on human health and safety is off on the wrong foot. We tend
to be object-oriented people, but human health and safety must be the
top priority throughout the plan.
I recommend the book PREP: Planning for Response and Emergency
Preparedness, published by the Texas Association of Museums with the
assistance of IMS (now IMLS). I think you can get copies through the
American Association of Museums. I'm biased; I was on the committee
that wrote it. Still, I use it as a reference all the time for just
this kind of thing.
I also strongly suggest that you get in touch with George
Baumgardner and Kathryn Vaughn at the Texas Cooperative Wildlife
Collection, Texas A&M University, for an in-depth look at what
happened and how they responded when their collections were
submerged after a water line ruptured.
The only materials I can think of in natural history ranges that may
pose unique problems are fluid-preserved materials (problems with
solvent exposure and flammability) and materials treated with
heavy-metal biocides such as arsenic and mercury. There is a lively
debate in the natural history community as to whether or not primary
types should be stored separately for ease of top-priority rescue. Me,
I've found that you can't really rigidly plan what you're going to
rescue first because you don't know what the disaster will be or what
areas you will be able to reach. Your response plan has to be
extremely flexible to accommodate reality: you're not going to be the
top response priority if you have a community-wide disaster, your key
staff may not be able to get to the scene for some time, the building
itself may be off-limits for some time until the authorities declare
it safe to enter (and, in that interim, it is not your building, it is
their building), you may not be allowed back in the building once
you're safely out....etc. If your plan is based on the assumption that
everyone will be present, able to complete assigned jobs, and have
nothing else to think about other than collections rescue, your plan
may not be worth much when put to the test.
Cheers,
Sally Shelton
Treasures of Assisi further damaged by new wave of quake (Daily
Telegraph London)
By Bruce Johnston in Rome
THE latest earthquake to unsettle Umbria has caused further serious
damage in and around Assisi, especially in the vicinity of the Santa
Chiara complex.
Cracks caused by the quake in September in the 13th-century basilica
of Santa Chiara, whose crypt houses the remains of St Francis's
companion, St Clare, have been dangerously widened by last Friday's
tremor, which registered 4.7 on the Richter scale. It followed another
quake the previous week of the same magnitude.
Still more seriously, ceilings and walls inside the monumental
Convent of St Clare, built by an olive grove and alongside the
basilica, have now collapsed, while the convent's outer walls have
been so weakened that the structure may give way completely.
Down in the valley, dangerous cracks have appeared in the ceiling of
the basilica of Santa Maria degli Angeli, raising fears that another
tremor could bring parts of it crashing down, as happened on Sept 26
in the upper church of St Francis, where four people died when they
were buried in the rubble. At the opposite end of the town to St
Clare's basilica and cloistered nunnery, the latest quake has weakened
the upper part of the campanile of the Franciscan complex, and the
papal hall and refectory of the friary have also been badly affected.
Inside the upper church of St Francis, which appears to be almost
held together by the scaffolding that now covers it, there was also
some damage which, although relatively light, has only helped to
heighten the sense of emergency. In open contradiction to Italy's
Fine Arts Department estimates that the upper church would be ready
to open for the Millennium, Sergio Fusetti, in charge of the church's
upkeep, said at the weekend: "The upper basilica will not be
re-opened to the public before 2006."
The latest quake caused plaster to rain from the left part of the
church's already weakened transept, while two fragments of fresco
depicting sections of a blue sky have come away from the apse behind
the altar. Last Friday's quake, which was followed by a number of
aftershocks - 126 on Saturday alone - has surprised experts because of
the way its epicentre has moved northwards to Gualdo Tadino, above
Perugia.
In the town (population 12,000), which contains many old buildings
and churches and houses one of Umbria's most important art
collections, many roofs caved in at the weekend and the walls of
buildings were scarred with cracks. There have been 1,000 reports of
damaged dwellings in this town alone. A number of villages outside
Gualdo have been very hard hit and many residents have been left
without water.
An estimated 8,000 people in Gualdo and nearby Nocera Umbra, to the
south, slept in emergency lodgings or in municipal buildings at the
weekend. In Gualdo, where one quarter of the population had to be fed
by the authorities, the hospital was evacuated and schools both there
and in nearby Gubbio and other towns will remain closed today, as many
are now makeshift dormitories.
A special train has arrived in Gualdo to provide emergency lodging
for 600 people, in addition to 180 caravans that were brought in over
the weekend. But other towns near the original epicentre have
complained that caravans previously at their disposal have been
plucked from away under their noses and taken to the newly affected
areas.
Tomorrow's visit to the region by President Oscar Scalfaro could
provide an opportunity for local people to vent their anger,
regardless of the authorities' promises that the towns are out of
danger. Fabrizio Fiorentini, 39, from Gualdo, said: "They're trying to
play things down in order to avoid causing panic. But they can't fool
us. We know they've sent 6,000 body bags to Umbria, and 800 of them
are right here in Gualdo. Even they are fearing the worst."
Confidentiality policy (Bill Parker
parker.166@postbox.acs.ohio-state.edu)
I am looking for sample museum confidentiality policies. Does anyone
know where I could get some samples?
Thanks in advance.
*****************************************
William O. Parker
Security Services
OSU - Wexner Center
for the Arts
1871 N. High St., Cols., OH 43210
(614)292-3643 / Fax (614)292-6865
Russia: Germans Expect To Challenge Art Ruling (Radio Free Europe)
By Roland Eggleston
Bonn, 6 April 1998 (RFE/RL) -- Germany says Russian parliamentarians
opposed to the repatriation of German art treasures looted by the Red
Army in World War II have "scored a point" in the legal battle but
have not yet won.
The Russian constitutional court today ruled that President Boris
Yeltsin must sign a law banning the repatriation of the art treasures.
The law has twice been approved by the Duma.
About 200,000 items are involved, including gold treasures, thousands
of rare books, paintings and drawings as well as porcelain collections
and furniture. The looted goods include the so-called "Gold of Troy,"
found by the German archaeologist Heinrich Schliemann on the site of
the ancient Greek city of Troy in 1873. It is now believed to be at
least 1,200 years older than Troy. Russian troops took it from a
museum in Berlin in 1945.
In 1995 Russia also put on display in St. Petersburg 74 impressionist
and post-impressionist paintings taken from Germany during the war.
The included paintings by Degas, van Gogh, Gauguin, Renoir, Monet,
Cezanne and Toulouse-Lautrec, which German museums would love to have
back.
Yeltsin opposes the law because he believes it would damage relations
between Germany and Russia. Last year he declined to sign it because
of procedural irregularities in the parliamentary voting.
A Bonn Foreign Ministry official today said that although the ruling
appeared final, legal experts believed the way was still open for
Yeltsin to challenge the content of the law and its individual parts.
"We understand that President Yeltsin's legal advisors also believe
that a challenge to the content is possible," the German official
said.
The German Foreign Ministry pointed out that Russia agreed to return
to Germany all art works seized in the war in two treaties signed with
Bonn -- in 1990 and 1992. On February 10, 1993, the then German
interior minister and the Russian culture minister signed an agreement
establishing a joint commission to work out the details. At that time,
both ministers said it should be possible to return at least some
treasures within a short period of time although they acknowledged
that a comprehensive repatriation agreement would take years to
achieve.
However, Germany subsequently charged that in 1995 Russian cultural
officials delayed the negotiations by arguing that an arrangement
should not be reached before the ceremonies marking the defeat of
Hitler Germany. On other occasions Russia used constitutional
objections.
The main objection -- voiced by many members of the Duma and by
museum directors -- is that German troops destroyed or looted
thousands of Russian treasures during the wartime invasion of Russia
and Russia should keep most of what its own troops seized as
compensation.
Adding to the German frustration is the fact that some of the
treasures held by Russian museums have been stolen and offered for
private sale to European and U.S. art collectors. In 1996 a Washington
lawyer, Thomas Kline, said at least a dozen works taken from museums
in the German port of Bremen, had surfaced in New York.
Yeltsin plan to return looted art thwarted (BBC News)
The matter was sent to the constitutional court after the Russian
parliament overturned a presidential veto.
From Moscow, James Coomarasamy reports:
The court's decision appears to signal a rare victory for the Russian
parliament over President Yeltsin.
According to the ruling the Russian leader will now have to sign the
bill into law, effectively keeping billions of dollars worth of art
seized by the Red Army during World War II in Russia.
The art, which includes paintings by Renior, Van Gogh and Gauguin,
came largely from Nazi Germany and Mr Yeltsin has described the bill
as a threat to Russian German relations.
He wants the art returned, but MPs disagree. They say it was
compensation for the losses inflicted on the Soviet Union by the
Nazis.
Yeltsin won't give up
The President's representative at the court, Sergei Shakhrai, said he
would accept the ruling but made it clear that the President didn't
see it as the end of the matter.
Mr. Yeltsin's veto which the court overturned was invoked on a matter
of parliamentary procedure.
According to Mr. Shakhrai, the Russian leader intends to make a
further attempt to block the law on the grounds that it contravenes
Russia's international commitments.
The court's ruling comes at the beginning of an important week in
relations between President Yeltsin and parliament.
On Tuesday Mr. Yeltsin will host round table talks with his
parliamentary opponents on the formation of Russia's new government.
He remains confident that his candidate for Prime Minister, the
former fuel and energy minister, Sergei Kirienko, will be accepted by
MPs.
Russian war booty: the judges rule (BBC News)
The new development is a ruling from Russia's Constitutional Court,
which says that President Boris Yeltsin may not refuse to sign a draft
law when both houses of the Russian parliament have overturned his
presidential veto.
However, explains BBC regional analyst, Stephen Mulvey, the battle is
not over yet.
Today's ruling is the first court judgement in this protracted
dispute, but not the last.
The Constitutional Court was responding to a case lodged by the
parliament, asking whether it was legal for the president to refuse to
sign a draft law which gathered sufficient support for a presidential
veto to be overturned.
Oleg Rumyantsev, constitutional expert - It's very important the
court reminded Yeltsin of his limitations (1'53") Following the
court's judgement the president must now sign the law, which declares
Soviet Second World War booty to be Russian national property.
However, President Yeltsin himself has also asked the court to rule
on a related issue - he questions whether proper parliamentary
procedures were followed when the law was adopted.
Furthermore, according to his representative at the Constitutional
Court the president will soon lodge another case challenging the law's
constitutionality, on the grounds that it conflicts with Russia's
obligations under international law.
Yeltsin pulled in two directions
President Yeltsin is in a difficult position, facing one set of
demands from the parliament, and another from the international
community, particularly Germany, where much of the looted art
originated.
The Constitutional Court provides President Yeltsin with his only
chance of escaping from this corner.
The Russian parliament's view is that the war booty is just
compensation for the devastation caused by the German army in the
Soviet Union.
Millions were killed, entire villages were burned to the ground, and
it's alleged that the invaders were making a deliberate attempt to
destroy Slavic culture as they wrecked churches and imperial palaces.
Galina Kislovskaya deputy director, library of foreign literature:
Gutenburg Bible is among the Russian art treasures (2'33")
The new law does not altogether rule out the return of works of art,
but it establishes a very complicated procedure.
An official request must be made, the consent of the local
authorities must be obtained, and parliament must vote on each case.
President Yeltsin has other objections to the law, apart from those
he has asked the Constitutional Court to rule on.
He's pointed out, for example, that it makes no distinction between
works of art stolen from enemies, allies or private individuals.
He's the one, after all, who has to answer the Hungarian government's
question whether it can be right to regard loot from the collection of
a Hungarian Jew as reparation for damage done by the German army.
There's a section of Russian public opinion that believes the art
should be handed back.
Long-hidden treasures
For most of the past 50 years the Soviet government denied its
existence, and kept it hidden in basements.
In some cases its condition has been steadily deteriorating, and the
Russian authorities do not have the resources to restore it all
immediately.
Today's court ruling was a rare setback for President Yeltsin, who
does not often concede a trick to parliament. It's certain that he'll
do all he can to avenge this defeat, and to prevent it leading to a
deterioration in relations with powerful foreign states.
Court Tells Yeltsin to Sign Booty Art Law (Russia Today)
MOSCOW -- (Reuters) Russia's Constitutional Court ruled on Monday that
President Boris Yeltsin could not block laws approved twice by
parliament, effectively halting the Kremlin's plans to return wartime
"booty" art to Germany.
But the constitutional wrangle pitting Yeltsin against both houses of
parliament could still drag on for many months. He is expected to
appeal to the court over alleged parliamentary irregularities when the
bill was approved.
"The president of Russia does not have the right not to sign a
federal law rejected by him after its second approval by the Duma
(lower house) and the Federation Council (upper house)," the court
said in a statement.
Parliament had asked the Constitutional Court to rule on Yeltsin's
veto powers after he twice refused to sign a law halting the
repatriation, mainly to Germany, of art treasures seized by the Red
Army during World War II.
Last summer Yeltsin invoked procedural irregularities during
parliamentary voting when he refused to sign the bill.
Germany, Russia's biggest trading partner and creditor, wants Moscow
to return its vast hoard of art treasures, which includes a rare
Gutenberg bible, gold artifacts supposedly from the ancient site of
Troy and paintings by Impressionists Claude Monet and Henri Matisse.
Many Russians agree with the parliamentarians, saying the art should
stay as compensation for Nazi Germany's destruction of Russian
cultural treasures and the sufferings of the Soviet Union, which lost
27 million people in the war.
Yeltsin, who values close political and economic ties with Germany
and its chancellor Helmut Kohl, has vowed to return the treasures,
citing two international treaties signed by Moscow.
On Monday RIA news agency quoted Yeltsin's representative in the
Constitutional Court, Sergei Shakhrai, as saying the president would
dispute "both the content of the new law and its adoption procedure."
Itar-Tass news agency quoted Duma lawyers as saying Yeltsin would
have to sign the law before being able to challenge it afresh in the
Constitutional Court.
Swiss defer comment on looted art until report out (Reuters )
BERNE, April 7 (Reuters) - Switzerland said on Tuesday it could give
no new data on how much art looted by the Nazis had found its way into
the country until the final results of a research project were
published later this year.
``The Ministry for Culture is sticking to the position that the study
is not yet completed and therefore based on the facts at hand today it
is not possible to make a quantitative statement about supposed stolen
art in Switzerland,'' the ministry said in a statement.
A Swiss newspaper on Sunday had reported on the study, which it said
is looking into claims that far more art than originally thought found
its way into private collections and museums in Switzerland.
Studies have been done in the past, and at least one Swiss collector
has been forced to repurchase works which were found to have been
stolen by Nazis from private owners.
But, according to the Swiss newspaper SonntagsBlick, at least one
lawyer was gathering material for a possible legal claim based on new
findings.
The Ministry of Culture said its report would deal with how the art
market developed in Switzerland between 1930 and 1955, and the role
Switzerland played in those developments.
Switzerland in 1948 declared that it had uncovered 77 items of looted
art.
Yeltsin calls trophy art ruling a ``slap in face'' (Reuters)
MOSCOW, April 7 (Reuters) - President Boris Yeltsin on Tuesday
described a Constitutional Court ruling on wartime trophy art as ``a
slap in the face'' that would prevent Russia retrieving artefacts
from abroad. The court said on Monday that Yeltsin could not block
laws approved twice by parliament halting the return of treasures
seized by the Red Army during World War Two. ``The government and I
received a slap in the face from the Constitutional Court, which
supported the State Duma's (lower parliament chamber) claim on the
law on valuables, and not the president,'' Yeltsin told a round-table
meeting in the Kremlin. ``There are many more Russian artefacts in
the foreign lands,'' he said. ``We cannot touch them under this
law.'' ``But we are not discussing that. The Constitutional Court
has decided and nothing can be done about it,'' Yeltsin said,
implying he would finally sign the controversial law. ``I am still
convinced that (from the point of view of) civilised world practice
it is a wrong decision,'' he told the meeting of political leaders.
Presidential press secretary Sergei Yastrzhembsky said later Yeltsin
was not blaming the court but was unhappy about the work of his
representatives in the court who lost the legal battle. ``The
president said that the court's decision is final. It is normal, it
should be so in a democratic state,'' he said in a television
interview. The court ruling came during a tough political crisis in
Russia and on the eve of Tuesday's round table. Yeltsin, keen to
foster close ties with Germany and his personal friend Chancellor
Helmut Kohl, has long been at odds with both houses of parliament
over the draft law on booty art, which he says contravenes Moscow's
international obligations. Yastrzhembsky said on Monday Yeltsin was
likely to sign the law but would continue to challenge its
legitimacy, probably in the Constitutional Court. The problem has
long been an irritant in post-Soviet Russia's generally warm
relations with Germany, Moscow's biggest trading partner and
creditor. Germany said on Monday the bill violated international
law. France, the Netherlands and other countries are also anxious
for the return of assets first removed by the Germans and then taken
to the Soviet Union. Among the more valuable items in question are a
rare Gutenberg bible, gold artefacts believed to be from the ancient
site of Troy, drawings by Rembrandt and paintings by French
Impressionists Claude Monet and Henri Matisse. Under the new law, the
return of any individual item of war booty would be subject to
parliamentary approval, all but blocking any effective handover.
Yeltsin has twice refused to sign the bill and the upper house
accused him of overstepping his constitutional powers -- a charge
upheld by the Constitutional Court on Monday. As well as Russia's
international obligations, Yeltsin has also invoked procedural
irregularities during parliamentary voting as a reason for not
signing the bill. But many Russians agree with the parliamentarians,
saying the art should stay as compensation for Nazi Germany's
destruction of Russian cultural treasures and the sufferings of the
Soviet Union, which lost 27 million people in the war. Russian
treasures seized by Germans include, along with many others, the
fabled ``Amber Chamber'' from the Catherine Palace near St
Petersburg, a gift to Russian Tsar Peter the Great from Prussia in
the 18th century.
http://www.artnet.com/magazine/index.html
SUPREME COURT HEARS NEA DECENCY CASE
On Mar. 31, 1998, the Supreme Court heard arguments in the
long-running lawsuit by four performance artists -- Karen Finley, et
al. -- against the National Endowment for the Arts, challenging the
arts agency's application of so-called "decency standards" in its
grant awards as an infringement of free speech. The Associated Press
captured the general prurience that has attended the censorship
efforts, with a lead that read, "Prompted by a naked artist dipped in
chocolate...." Finley, who has been known to pour chocolate on herself
in performance but never actually masqueraded as a chocolate-covered
cherry, was at the hearing -- though she was not allowed to speak, of
course. "It's quite a good installation piece," said Finley of the
court setting, "with the columns and all the red velvet. It's done up
just like Mount Olympus, and when the judges come in they're like
gods." Her lawyer, David Cole, told the justices that the NEA decency
rules unconstitutionally favored art that is "respectful of American
beliefs" and suppressed points of view that challenge public
sensibilities. The government position, as advocated by Solicitor
General Seth P. Waxman, seemed to be that the standards were only
general guidelines and a compromise with Congress, and were not
actually meant to be restrictive. Justice Anthony M. Kennedy chided
Waxman for arguing that the statute was essentially a meaningless,
"wink, wink, nudge, nudge approach" to curtailing grant money,
according to the Washington Post. A decision is expected in late June.
Russians urged to return art (The Age Australia)
By GEOFF KITNEY
EUROPE CORRESPONDENT
BERLIN, TUESDAY
The German Government has urged the Russian President, Mr Boris
Yeltsin, to resist a court ruling and go ahead with handing back
billions of dollars worth of treasures stolen from Nazi Germany by
Soviet troops.
A ruling by the Russian Constitutional Court on Monday will block
President Yeltsin from ordering that a vast treasure trove of
historical artefacts, jewellery, books and famous paintings, which Red
Army soldiers plundered at the end of World War II, be shipped back to
Germany and returned to the owners. It was a gesture intended as a
symbol of East-West rapprochement.
But the German Government immediately questioned the court decision,
saying the Russian law violated international law and President
Yeltsin should overturn it.
The Constitutional Court ruled that a law proclaiming the art
treasures as just compensation from Germany for the damage it
inflicted on Russia in World War II was valid.
President Yeltsin has twice refused to sign the law and now,
according to his office, he intends to appeal against the ruling
validating it.
He has made the return of what is known as "trophy art" to Germany a
major cause for his presidency. As recently as two weeks ago he
reassured the German Chancellor, Mr Helmut Kohl, he was determined
that large parts of the collection held in various Russian museums and
galleries would be handed back to Germany before he left office.
The stolen art treasures have been a major source of friction between
Germany and Russia, which is why President Yeltsin chose to make their
return a symbol of the transformation of relations between the former
Western and Eastern blocs.
It is estimated that Soviet soldiers returning home after the final
defeat of the Nazis took with them more than 200,000 art treasures and
more than two million books. It is also estimated that the Nazis
plundered tens of thousands of precious pieces from Russia during the
German invasion.
Germany has returned an estimated 24,000 items to Russia but only a
handful of items have been handed back by Russia, all of them by the
Soviet Union to former communist East Germany during the Cold War.
The items still held by Russian museums, galleries and government
authorities include extraordinary historic items and artworks by some
of the great masters. They include 100 early Bronze Age artefacts
claimed to be from the ruins of Troy, an almost priceless Gutenberg
Bible, and some of the greatest works by van Gogh, Gauguin, Monet and
Matisse.
Many of the items were hidden by the Soviet authorities for nearly 50
years and it was thought they had been destroyed or lost forever as a
result of the war. But after the fall of the Berlin wall the new
Russian Government began to confirm the existence of the lost artworks
and some of them were exhibited, including a controversial showing of
stolen van Gogh, Gauguin and Degas paintings at the famous Hermitage
Museum in St Petersburg.
This was followed by an exhibition of "Priam's Treasure", taken from
what was claimed to be the ruins of the city of Troy by the German
archeologist Heinrich Schliemann in 1873, and thought lost after they
were plundered from a Berlin museum in 1945. This collection includes
jewelled gold swords and axes, golden diadems, necklaces and earrings
and copper and silver bowls.
In 1993 a meeting of the Russian and German Governments agreed to
begin the process of returning the treasures but ever since then their
has been fierce resistence within Russia to the plan.
Finally, a verdict in the case that has shocked the art world (The Age Australia)
By VIRGINIA TRIOLI and STEPHEN CAUCHI
A former art dealer was found guilty yesterday of stealing more than
$2 million worth of paintings from the renowned Australian artist,
Albert Tucker.
Max Michael Joffe, 50, of Myrtle Street, Ripponlea, showed no emotion
as the verdicts were read out in the County Court. The County Court
jury, which spent five days deliberating, found Joffe guilty on 24
counts of theft and one count of obtaining property by deception. He
was found not guilty of the remaining 57 counts of theft.
Joffe pleaded not guilty to all the charges.
The conviction was greeted with relief by the 83-year-old artist. His
wife, Barbara Tucker, told The Age they could not comment before
sentencing, further than saying, "You wouldn't believe how relieved he
is."
Others close to Mr Tucker echoed her view, saying the experience had
been long and harrowing for the artist and all who knew him.
Mr Tucker's biographer, art historian Janine Burke, said yesterday
that Joffe found himself in "an Aladdin's cave" of treasure when he
started cataloguing Tucker's vast and disordered collection in 1994,
which included works by some of Australia's most eminent artists.
"Tucker's house was filled with really high quality, important and
valuable Australian art: the temptation was simply too great to
resist," Ms Burke said.
The damage done by the matter, Ms Burke believes, spreads far into
the art community. "There are no winners in this - Tucker is
traumatised, Max is in jail and the art world looks like the kind of
shonky place where this can happen."
Judge Leslie Ross remanded Joffe in custody until next Wednesday,
when he is scheduled to hear Joffe's plea before sentencing.
The charges related to 80 paintings by Mr Tucker and others,
including Arthur Boyd, Daniala Vassilieff, and Mr Tucker's late
former wife, Joy Hester, which went missing from Mr Tucker's
collection in 1994. Half are still missing.
The court heard that Albert Tucker met Max Joffe, a former art
teacher and dealer, in the late 1980s and appointed him trustee of
his Trust Foundation in 1988. Joffe had an interest in artists of the
1940s and a collection of his own. In early 1994, Joffe started to
help Mr Tucker catalogue and order his vast and uncounted
collections, as the ageing artist was concerned he might die leaving
his life's work in a mess.
By about July 1994, Mr Tucker noticed some paintings were missing.
And then some books. And some rare magazines. He accused Joffe of
stealing them and told the court in evidence that Joffe and his de
facto, Lorraine Finlay, immediately brought around a parcel of 11
missing paintings and a book.
Mr Tucker told the court he was devastated. He said he recalled
becoming very abusive towards Joffe, telling him he was "a moral black
hole". Joffe, Mr Tucker said, sat on a couch "like a stunned mullet",
begging for forgiveness and saying he wanted to commit suicide.
Joffe also returned four other works from auction houses in Sydney
and Melbourne. Police said six paintings were eventually recovered
from the Christie's, Sotheby's and Lawson's auction houses.
Mr Tucker said that in early 1995, he conducted an audit of his works
and found 80 were missing, including those returned by Joffe. A police
search of Joffe's Ripponlea house in March 1995 uncovered another 13
of the missing works. Shortly after, police charged Joffe with the
theft of the missing works and with accepting $75,000 in cash in 1994
from a friend to purchase four or five Tucker paintings.
In his defence, Joffe told the court that Mr Tucker accepted his
offer to select works from his own collection to replace the missing
works. He said that Mr Tucker never left him alone in the house.
Ms Burke said Tucker was a vulnerable old man at the time and that
the experience has been shattering. "This nearly crushed him and it
has had a devastating effect on his life ever since 1995 when it was
made public. It has dominated his life," she said.
Bowie and Boyd "hoax" art world (BBC News)
Some of the biggest names in the art world have reportedly been
fooled by a biography of a fake artist created by the author William
Boyd and the rock star David Bowie. Last week the glitterati of New
York gathered for a launch party of Boyd's biography of the
apparently rediscovered American painter Nat Tate. Bowie, a director
of 21 Publishing, the company which produced the book, read extracts
to the gathering. Critics on the other side of the Atlantic were due
to attend the British launch of the memoir on Tuesday. Several
British papers, including the Sunday Telegraph, have already run
extracts from the book. Excerpts were also published on Bowie's own
website.
Fake history
However, the Independent newspaper says Tate and the story of how he
befriended painters Picasso and Braque, suffered from depression,
burned most of his paintings and then killed himself aged 31, is all
fiction. Some of the paintings pictured in the book were reportedly
by Boyd himself. Photos of Tate were from Boyd's own collection of
pictures of unidentified people. The ruse was made more convincing by
an endorsement on the book's dust cover from the veteran writer and
political commentator Gore Vidal. In the book he is also quoted as
remembering Tate as "essentially dignified, drunk with nothing to
say". John Richardson, the acclaimed biographer of the artist Pablo
Picasso, was also in on the scam and is also quoted. Karen Wright,
one of Bowie's co-directors at 21 Publishing said the hoax was not
meant to be malicious. "Part of it was, we were very amused that
people kept saying 'Yes, I've heard of him'. There is a willingness
not to appear foolish. Critics are too proud for that."
British joke falls flat in New York (Times of London)
FROM TUNKU VARADARAJAN
IN NEW YORK
A LITERARY hoax that never was has left New Yorkers bemused and
perplexed. It concerns William Boyd, the novelist, David Bowie, the
rock star, and Nat Tate, a fictitious American artist whose "life"
Boyd has celebrated in a new book. According to reports from London,
Bowie organised a party at the SoHo, New York, studio of Jeff Koons,
the artist, on March 31. Writers and journalists were among the
guests. Boyd was the star turn and was to read from his book, which
tells the tale of Tate, a modern Rupert Brooke figure who committed
suicide aged 31. The aim was to peddle the story to the journalists
as fact, in the hope that it would appear in the New York papers the
next morning, April Fool's Day. But the hoax did not come off. The
party went with a swing, but not one word appeared in any of the
newspapers the following day. Or even the day after. Clearly, no one
had taken it seriously. Reports have now filtered through from
London to the effect that The Independent carried a front-page story
about how the novelist "fooled the US art world". The Evening
Standard followed suit. But the question everyone here is asking is:
What hoax?
Main Indexpage

