When Denney moved permanently to Spain in 1970, Sacco IV was one of thirty pictures lent to the Dallas Museum of Art. It was lent on from the DMA, with the agreement of the owner, to the Italian Art in the 20th Century exhibition, held at the Royal Academy in London in 1989. It features as Plate 165 in 'Italian Art in the 20th Century - Painting and Sculpture 1900-1988', edited by Emily Braun and published by Prestel Verlag Munich and the Royal Academy.
It was sent on, apparently on the instruction of the owner, to Mme Anthony Denney, 29 Rue des Ste Peres, Paris at the end of the exhibition. (Reference : Royal Academy exhibition files.)
The picture reappeared in 1991 as a candate for purchase by the City of Toulouse from an anonymous owner for a price of 2 million French Francs. (Ref 23) (Note: Value for insurance purposes in 1987 was £287,000).
![]() |
The picture was displayed in the 'Donation Denney' Exhibition in the Refectoire des Jacobins Toulouse early in 1994. Its provenance was described as: "Collection Madame Celia Denney (Proposition d'achat)". However, this attribution of ownership to the widow by the City of Toulouse does not appear to be supported by documentary evidence. It it is reasonable to assume that the picture has never left Anthony Denney's estate. |
Because the picture appeared to be the subject of appreciable risk of
being sold to the City of Toulouse, the Denney children were
advised to take interim conservatory action in the French courts.
They failed in this action. The view taken by the French Courts was:
(1) the Denney children had failed to justify any apparent right
on the succession of their father, because the Spanish decision in their
favour at First Instance was subject to appeal and had not yet been
validated;
(2) there was no serious risk of the picture disappearing because of
the media coverage surrounding the proposed acquisition of the picture
by the City of Toulouse;
(3) applying article 2279 of the Civil Code "en fait de meubles possession
vaut titre" (possession gives title), possession by the widow was unequivocal,
which overturned all appearance of right in favour of the demandants.