Museum Security website statistics; over 1000 hits per week

October 13, 1999

CONTENTS:

- Re: Library sprinkler systems (Kathleen Coleridge)
- Re: Library sprinkler systems (William A. Heidecker)
- Minor listings of stolen & missing art (Jonathan Sazonoff)
- Clashes Over Italy Antiquity Plea



(Exlibris)
From: Kathleen Coleridge Kathleen.Coleridge@vuw.ac.nz
Subject:

Re: Library sprinkler systems

Here in Wellington, New Zealand, we also are in an earthquake zone. We had a sprinkler system installed in our 1965 completed, 10 storey building, about 4 years ago. The system is dry-pipe (I think that's the term -- no water in the pipes until the actual release) and we have had no problems. There was a period of settling in, with tests and going round checking that there were no leaks, and the workmen coming back to complete the seals on the occasional faulty joint or sprinkler head, but once it was done it's just a matter of the building supervisors keeping an eye on the systems (I think it's all monitored with water pressures etc, as part of security).
We lost a bit of headroom, because of minimum clearance requirements, but otherwise there've been no negatives. It does depend very heavily on very close quality control and oversight at the installation stage -- we were quite happy with the supervising consultant engineer and the quality of their work, otherwise it would have been a much more worrying business. Get the groundwork properly laid, with the supervisors really briefed about everything that's important to you. It probably helps to have some really heavy penalty clauses in the contract about damage and inadequate performance -- especially if you've got a strongly competitive local industry hungry for work, and a lot of possible contracts to be let! Special Materials (Rare books & archives) was "sprinklered" along with the rest. I made sure that I had a plentiful supply of plastic sheeting to cover stacks etc for the period before the tests had been finished, but even though there were a few minor leaks it all came in the aisles. They tested with compressed air before testing with water
Kathleen A. Coleridge
Special Materials Librarian
University Library
Victoria University of Wellington
P.O. Box 3438 Telephone: +64-4-463 5681
Wellington Facsimile: +64-4-471 2070 New
Zealand E-mail: Kathleen.Coleridge@vuw.ac.nz


From: "William A. Heidecker" heideckerwa@worldnet.att.net
Subject:

Library Fires Date

I will try to answer your questions as concisely and succinctly as I can. My background is in risk assessment and loss prevention. I do not design, sell, or install sprinkler systems and therefore I have no financial interest in whatever system you install.
"Sprinkle library": A good investment. The concern is not only about the cost of replacing the building and collections, but the cultural loss.
Mist systems: Not a good idea for a library. Actually the mist technology is not fully developed. Some systems are being installed, but it is not applicable to libraries.
Contractors: You need to contact one or more sprinkler manufacturers, who can direct you to sprinkler contractors in your areas. Some of the leading sprinkler manufacturers are Central Sprinkler Co. (800-523-6512), Firematic Sprinkler Devices, Inc. (800-225-7288), Globe Fire Sprinkler Corp (800-248-0278) www.globesprinkler.com, Grinnell Fire Protection Systems (216-871-9900) www.grinnell.com, Star Sprinkler, Inc. (800-558-5236), and Viking Corp. (800-968-9501) www.vikingcorp.com.
Specifications, general: (1) The system must be designed in accordance with NFPA-13, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems, (2) the system must be designed by an experienced sprinkler designer (in some cases the sprinkler manufacturer will produce the design for the contractor), and (3) the system must be installed by an experienced sprinkler installation firm (not a plumber or general contractor!), and (4) the system must be tested and a certificate produced as required by NFPA-13.
Earthquake considerations: NFPA-13 contains special requirements for buildings in earthquake zones; reference to these requirements should be included in the specifications.
Inergen: Forget it! The gaseous extinguishing agents are not appropriate for libraries. The problem is that fire tends to burrow into piles of paper (read: books on shelves). The gaseous agents cannot penetrate the exterior char to extinguish the fire. Besides, libraries tend to be cavernous buildings and one must literally fill the compartment to extinguish the fire. The amount of gas required for such a building would be enormous.
Broken pipes: A legitimate concern. However, automatic sprinkler piping that has been properly installed and tested is far less likely to leak than other plumbing. With regard to the sprinkler heads: the failure rate for automatic sprinkler heads is very good.
Water damage: Always a valid concern. Consider "on-off" sprinklers, such as the Grinnell Model F927. These devices utilize a heat-sensitive bimetallic disk to automatically open and close the sprinkler outlet via a pilot chamber. The bimetallic disk reacts to an increase or decrease in ambient temperature, thereby enabling the sprinkler head to cycle open and close. Note that regardless of whether an on-off head or a conventional head is used, only the sprinkler heads exposed to the heat of the fire will actuate. Do not give credence to the mistaken notion that all sprinkler heads in the room release water during a fire.
If you are interested, I can forward the following documents pertaining to automatic sprinkler protection for libraries.
*National Library of Scotland-protecting a nation's heritage
*Fast Response Sprinklers Protect The British Library
*Fire Tests of Library Bookstacks, a Factory Mutual Engineering Division Laboratory Report

Please contact me if you need copies of any of the foregoing.
I also have a report on the disastrous Los Angeles Central Library fire (1986), a one-page article describing the Norwich (U.K.) library fire (1994), and a listing of serious fires in libraries and museums between 1986-1991. However, the fire reports and statistical listing documents in this paragraph have not been scanned, so they are not immediately available for electronic forwarding.
William A. Heidecker
Severn Risk Management, Inc.
645 Oakland Hills Drive, A-3
Arnold, MD 21012 USA


From: Jonathan Sazonoff saz@kwom.com
Subject:

Minor listings of stolen & missing art

Dear Subscribers,
While we maintain a list of stolen art web-sites www.saztv.com/page9.html we don't listed all the stolen art found on the web. There are also a number of individual listings. Some are missing, some stolen, but for those interested, here is a brief review of some of those listings.
Brun (Vigee Le) - Marie Antoinette http://www.batguano.com/VigeeMAgallery.html
Devos http://www1.cediti.be/~od/VolDevos.html
Dumas http://www.uni-kassel.de/fb22/Rob_scholte/dumas/info.html
Frost http://graphicarts.ceu.edu/JFrost_web/stolen.htm
Freas http://www.bab5.com/theft.html
Hosse http://www.creativearts.com/enchantedstudio/danhosse.htm
Howe http://www.mi.uib.no/~respl/tolkien/Artists/howe-theft.html
Howson http://sites.netscape.net/missingpicture/peterhowson.htm
Katz http://www.morriskatz.com/help.htm
Loder http://www.southern.com/sue/stolen.html
Loir http://www.theshop.net/campbell/art/loir.htm
Porter http://www.artnoir.com/theft.html
Ries http://www.erols.com/ries/stolen.html
Rudell http://www.nctimes.net/~hihorse/page219.htm
Salzmann http://www.art-science.com/Avis/stolen_painting.htm
Sandor http://art-collector.com/sandor/stolen/stolenx.htm
Wah http://www.studiowah.com/html/stolen_art.html

Hope you find this information useful.
Jonathan Sazonoff
Pres., Saz Productions Inc
http://www.saztv.com
Contributing US Ed.
Museum Security Network
http://www.museum-security.org/saz.html


Clashes Over Italy Antiquity Plea

By DAVID BRISCOE Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) - An Italian government request to protect a millennium's worth of ancient artifacts by banning their import into the United States sparked a clash between archaeologists and art dealers at a contentious government hearing Tuesday. The State Department's Cultural Property Advisory Committee is to make a recommendation on the request, which ultimately will be decided by President Clinton. The Italian request is the most sweeping demand ever made for restricting sale of artifacts under international agreements and a 1983 U.S. cultural properties law. Among a long list of items covered are pottery, stoneware, architectural elements, glassware, coins, sculpture, jewelry dating from the fifth century B.C. and covering the next 1,000 years. Art dealers and museum curators insist it would limit access by the American public to Italy's great cultural past. Archaeologists and the Italian government say it would help curb looting and theft of a treasured heritage. ``The commission agrees in the concern about the need to better understand the scope of the request being submitted,'' said commission chairman Martin E. Sullivan. A decision is not expected for weeks, possibly months. An Italian Embassy representative observed the committee's hearing but did not testify. Embassy officer Luigi Maccotta said he could not speak officially for the government but said as an Italian, he is bothered by the suggestions of some art dealers that Italy is trying to take away their freedom. ``We are just trying to establish some order,'' Maccotta said. ``We are not trying to limit the freedom of the public. We don't like the chain of illegal selling of objects.'' Art expert David Grace pulled a small Roman cup from a jacket pocket as an example of an artifact that might be affected, and coin collector Peter Tompa passed around ancient coins, including one he said was part of a collection belonging to President John Quincy Adams, as the scheduled two-hour hearing extended beyond four hours. Tompa said coins should not be covered because the best ones come from private caches buried away from significant archeological digs. ``Are we now going to allow a repressive society to reach beyond its borders?'' asked Arielle Kosloff, a New York gallery operator. ``Italy says its sites are being pillaged. I do not believe this is true at this time.'' But the head of the Archaeological Institute of America, Ricardo Elia, cited what he called ample evidence of continuing looting and theft, including recent successes by Italian art police in confiscating more than 30,000 pilfered artifacts in three separate raids. Elia clashed with a representative of Sotheby's, the New York auction house, on the source of Italian vases sold at an auction in New York and on the extent of Italy's looting problem. Citing the appearance of 4,200 southern Italian vases on world markets in recent years, Elia said, ``It's too much.'' The vases were not legitimately obtained, he insisted, and most are from looted archaeological sites. ``But it isn't,'' shouted Rena Moulopoulos, Sotheby's director of compliance. She said when the value of specific art objects increases, they begin to surface from a variety of sources, including legitimate private collections around the world. ``You don't have the data to support the number of thefts claimed,'' she said. Elia said auction houses, dealers and museums need to provide more documentation for artifacts they sell or display. Moulopoulos acknowledged in the hearing that Sotheby's includes the full known history of objects in its catalogs only when it would help to sell the item. Nevertheless, just because an object is undocumented doesn't mean it is stolen, she said. The commission itself also came under attack from some critics for holding its deliberations in secret and for going ahead with consideration of the Italian petition when two dealers' positions on the commission are unfilled. Appointed by the president, the commission normally includes two members representing museums, three experts in archaeology or related fields, three representing art dealers and three members of the public.



Main Indexpage