http://museum-security.org/
NOVEMBER 9, 1997
CONTENTS:
- LATEST ADDITIONS MUSEUM SECURITY WEBSITE
- WORLD HERITAGE NEWS
- THE ART WORLD'S SPOILS OF WAR
Murky histories cloud some local art.
By Maureen Goggin and Walter V. Robinson, Globe Staff (another proof of The Boston Globe's high standard investigative journalism!)
LATEST ADDITIONS MUSEUM SECURITY WEBSITE:
http://museum-security.org/latestad.html :
----The art of the Fake Egyptian forgeries from the Kelsey Museum of Archeaology ----Safety and Security Connection The Ultimate Guide to Safety and Security Resources on the Internet ----Glass Display Safe SecuraCorp International Pty. Ltd. Introducing a revolution in display security and protection for irreplaceable items.
----FIRE & BURGLAR ALARM EXPERT
----Websites & Newsgroups Related to Restoration / Conservation ----University of, Wisconsin, Madison, Actuarial Science, Risk Management and Insurance. This website not only has information related to the department, it also has a fairly extensive list of insurance related resource links.
----Insurance Industry Activity on the Web
WORLD HERITAGE NEWS:
WHNEWS 14.10 (9 November 1997)
Sender: owner-whnews@unesco.org
(For the latest information on World Heritage, consult the UNESCO World Heritage Centre WWW pages at http://www.unesco.org/whc/welcome.htm )
- UNITED STATES PROPOSES TO BAN MOST CARS FROM YOSEMITE NATIONAL PARK
- IN NEW PLAN RELEASED NOV. 4
- EL NINO IN THE GALAPAGOS, 1997
- INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF INTERPRETIVE
COMMUNICATION (ISAIC) ANNOUCES WEB SITE
--
** UNITED STATES PROPOSES TO BAN MOST CARS FROM
YOSEMITE NATIONAL PARK IN NEW PLAN RELEASED NOV. 4
<http://www.nps.gov/planning/yosemite/vip/> In an effort to reduce traffic congenstion in one of the most popular World Heritage sites in the United States, the US National Park Service has released a draft Yosemite Valley Implementation Plan/ Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement. The plan presents and analyzes four alternatives.
** EL NINO IN THE GALAPAGOS, 1997
In response to numerous questions from the public concerning the effect of the 1997 El Nino on the Galapagos Islands, Ecuador, the Charles Darwin Research Station at Puerto Ayora, Galapagos, Ecuador has prepared a report on the current situation in Galapagos, following the detection of climatic anomalies that have been identified by national and international meteorological agencies as effects of El Nino.
This report may be found at: http://fcdarwin.org.ec/el-nino-1e.html
** INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF INTERPRETIVE
COMMUNICATION (ISAIC) ANNOUCES WEB SITE
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 1997 13:23:53 -0500 (EST)
From: JVAINTERP@aol.com
ISAIC - the new International Society for the Advancement of Interpretive Communication, is pleased to announce the availability of its new InterNet web site at: www.ISAIC.org. ISAIC is a new heritage interpretation organization for interpreters and educators in museums, parks & forests, zoos, botanical gardens, historic & cultural sites, heritage tourism attractions and other related sites and facilities.
-- .
wheditor@unesco.org. The next electronic issue of this Newsletter will appear in about two weeks, depending on the volume of news submitted. The printed Newsletter is available at: http://www.unesco.org/whc/news/index-en.htm.
THE ART WORLD'S SPOILS OF WAR
Murky histories cloud some local art
By Maureen Goggin and Walter V. Robinson, Globe Staff, 11/09/97
French art dealer Cesar Mange de Hauke died in 1965. But he comes alive in declassified documents in the US National Archives: collaborating with the leader of the notorious Nazi effort to plunder artworks systematically from Jews, and driving a German staff car in occupied Paris. Yet in 1949, just as the State Department was denying him an immigration visa because of his Nazi complicity, de Hauke sold a magnificent pastel by Edgar Degas to New York financier Maurice Wertheim, whose collection passed to the Fogg Art Museum at Harvard, his alma mater, after his death in 1950. At the Fogg, correspondence on file shows that Wertheim was skeptical about de Hauke's right to sell Degas's "Singer with a Glove." But he bought it anyway. National Archives documents only add to those suspicions: State Department records, evidence that the art was owned by a French family whose collection was targeted by the Nazis in 1941, and information that before it fell into de Hauke's hands it belonged to a Swiss doctor who purchased at least one other looted painting. At both the Fogg and the Museum of Fine Arts in Boston, records suggest that other European artworks acquired during and after World War II arrived with pedigrees that should have aroused curiosity, if not suspicion. Now, a half-century later, once-secret government documents have provoked a fresh accounting of what happened to the war's spoils, and have provided new evidence that some unsuspecting collectors donated artworks that may have been plundered from Jews and other European collections to major museums. The Degas is unusual for the amount of documentation that suggests it might have passed illegally through Nazi hands and, ultimately, onto a second-floor wall in the Fogg's most celebrated gallery, the Wertheim Collection. But the two museums have other works with suspect characteristics: unexplained wartime ownership gaps, the involvement of dealers who collaborated with Nazi art looters, and, often, a failure by the collectors or museums to make inquiries before acquiring them. For example, a wartime FBI report suggests that the Museum of Fine Arts was nonchalant about the origin of its acquisitions during the war. The MFA's curator of prints, Henry Preston Rossiter, admitted to FBI agents in 1941 he knew that one dealer, Richard Zinser, whose works he bought routinely had been imprisoned in Germany for smuggling. Rossiter bought prints from Zinser, including valuable works by Albrecht Durer, even though, the FBI report noted, Rossiter said Zinser "never reveals where he obtains his works." After the FBI's visit, the MFA ceased buying Zinser's works. Even so, in an interview on Oct. 24, MFA director Malcolm Rogers asserted the museum has always insisted that its curators carefully check the history of any acquisition. As evidence of that longstanding commitment, he cited the MFA's written "Collection Policy" that contains that requirement. Last Thursday, a museum spokeswoman, Dawn Griffin, acknowledged that the MFA's Collection Policy had been approved by the museum's trustees on Oct. 23, the day before the Globe interview. She said, however, that it had been in preparation for more than a year. But it was not until Oct. 23 that the museum began requiring all dealers to sign bills of sale affirming their right to sell the artwork. Griffin refused the Globe's request to release a copy of the full 12-page written policy, saying it was an internal museum document.
An open market
Mark Masurovsky, one of the first historians to find evidence about unscrupulous dealers in the National Archives, said disinterest by museums in the origin of artworks "sent a clear signal during and after the war that there was an open and unquestioning market for looted artworks in the United States." With that encouragement, de Hauke and other unscrupulous emigre dealers had a clear financial incentive to prey on Jews, said Masurovsky, who is working for the Holocaust Art Restitution Project, an effort spearheaded by the National Jewish Museum to document and locate works looted from Jews. Jonathan Petropoulos, a historian at Loyola College in Baltimore who has written extensively about wartime plundering, said there is no evidence that American collectors and museums knew they were acquiring looted art. But the combination of seemingly legitimate middlemen, the zeal that museums brought to building their collections and their unwillingness to ask probing questions of dealers or donors had a predictable result. "The evidence, and it is growing, suggests that there may be hundreds of paintings in American museums that were stolen from Jews or looted from other European collections," Petropoulos said. "If you count drawings and lithographs, the number of artworks that have problematic ownership histories is probably in the thousands." At the MFA and the Fogg, Rogers and other officials are left defending acquisitions that, in many cases, were made before they were born. They note that many artworks have gaps in their ownership, simply, and most often innocently, because owners cherish their anonymity, and sometimes forget where they bought paintings. The archival evidence pointing to other motives has only become available in the last two decades. And as public institutions, their collections are published for any claimant who wishes to come forward. Moreover, the museum officials noted, there is no conclusive evidence that any of the paintings that the Globe asked about were stolen. And with no claimants for the artworks, much of the documentation is circumstantial. Art specialists interviewed by the Globe said the Fogg and MFA are hardly unique among museums for acquiring art without applying any of the customary standards of due diligence that are required by law when real estate and even used cars change hands. Nowadays, most museums follow a standard practice, requiring donors and art dealers to sign documents declaring they have clear title to the artwork. But experts in art law say such documents are legally meaningless, and amount to nothing more than a fig leaf for what the law now requires: a full title search that can identify problem artworks and provide a real defense if a claim is made.
Questionable provenance
The Globe decided to examine a small portion of the thousands of European paintings at the MFA and Fogg - modern paintings acquired during or after the war - after reporting earlier this year about war-related claims being pressed against other museums. The Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York and the Philadelphia Museum of Art are facing allegations that they acquired looted artworks after the war. In another case, curators at the Art Institute of Chicago helped a major benefactor, Daniel Searle, acquire a Degas monotype looted from a Dutch victim of the Holocaust. Officials at both the Fogg and the MFA cooperated, opening their archives for inspection, and doing original - and, some critics say, long overdue - research to fill gaps in provenance, or ownership of some paintings. The results, in some instances, are embarrassing to the museums, especially the Fogg, where four paintings have questionable provenances. At the Museum of Fine Arts, the issue is often how little it knows about some of its artworks. For example, the MFA bought a Monet painting from Brandeis University in 1974. Records at the MFA and Brandeis suggest that neither institution knew anything about the ownership of "Woodgatherers at the Edge of the Forest" during most of the century after Monet painted it in 1864. The painting was purchased in 1961 from New York dealer Alexander Ball by Harold Kaplan, who donated it to Brandeis in 1968. Ball, according to National Archives records, had frequent dealings with Nazi art looters - and a business relationship with Hans Wendland, who funneled numerous stolen paintings into a wartime black market that included emigre dealers in New York. At the MFA, some valuable paintings have no ownership history, except the name of the donors: The museum, for instance, knows nothing about the history of five paintings left to the museum in 1948 by one of its benefactors. The museum has also been unable to identify who owned one of its Picassos, "Standing Figure," during the 37 years before the MFA bought the work from Swiss dealer Fritz Nathan in 1958. In a letter to the Globe suggesting that suspicions about the provenance of MFA paintings are unwarranted, George T. M. Shackelford, the curator of European paintings, said Nathan's gallery "for more than half a century was generally regarded as one of the most distinguished art galleries in Europe." Yet Nathan was the wartime art adviser and purchasing agent for Emil G. Buhrle, a Swiss collector who knowingly bought many paintings that had been looted from Jews, according to extensive Allied interrogation reports in the National Archives. What's more, a 1921 auction catalog shows that the painting had been sold to a "Winberg." Rogers, speaking from hindsight, said knowledge about Ball's wartime activities makes it "very unlikely" the MFA would have purchased the "Woodgathers at the Edge of the Forest" without conducting a thorough investigation. "Clearly," he said, "that would ring alarm bells." But Rogers noted that much of the information surfaced only recently. "Inherent in the trading of any goods, as I'm sure you know since you must have bought second-hand goods yourself or from antique shops, is a matter of professional confidence," he said. As for most gaps, he added, "Human nature and memory are much more fragile than you think, and our knowledge is often incomplete.... Incompleteness is no grounds for suspicion." Still, he said, recent disclosures, some of them in the Globe, have led to a "new awareness [of a problem] that nobody guessed the size of, and we're all trying to cope with that." Rogers, confronting questions about artworks acquired a half century ago, wondered why they were not raised in the 1950s and 1960s by the many Jews who, he said, were art dealers, collectors and art historians. "But it is fascinating why in the years following the war ... more wasn't said, people weren't more enraged ... particularly since so many of the people in the art world were Jewish at that time. So many of the scholars were people who had fled. You know, most of the great giants in the art historical world were Jewish in that period ... The collectors were as well. Very strange," Rogers said.
Selling off paintings to survive
Unlike the much larger MFA, the Fogg has virtually no staff or money to undertake the sort of provenance research the Globe conducted: Its annual budget for out-of-town research is just $2,000. The Fogg collections, built on the philanthropy of Harvard's most successful graduates, also contain their share of paintings with incomplete, and sometimes suspicious ownership records. Across the room from the Degas in the Wertheim Collection is a haunting 1887 still life by Vincent van Gogh, "Three Pairs of Shoes," with its subliminal message about the misery of Europe's working poor. Wertheim bought it in late 1943 from the best-known of the emigre dealers, Georges Wildenstein. Wildenstein, like de Hauke, had a business relationship with Karl Haberstock, Hitler's principal art looter. But where did Wildenstein obtain the van Gogh? According to the Fogg's records, it came from Marcel Kapferer, a French Jew. His granddaughter, Francine Legrand-Kapferer, said in a recent interview that Kapferer hid his family from the Nazis in Cannes during the war, selling off paintings one at a time to survive. Legrand-Kapferer said that her grandfather frequently reminded his family that but for those sales, they would have died. All such sales under duress in Nazi-occupied Europe were declared invalid under a 1943 Allied declaration. If the van Gogh was among the works sold during the war - and Legrand-Kapferer said she did not know whether it was - then the artwork would enter a legal limbo. Even more suspicious is a Monet, "La Mere Paul," listed at the Fogg as owned before the war by Paul Wittgenstein in Vienna and bought by the Wertheim Fund for the Fogg in 1955. At the Globe's request, Austrian journalist Hubertus Czernin searched out Nazi records in Austrian archives. They show that the Nazis confiscated a substantial art collection from a renowned Vienna concert pianist of the same name, Paul Wittgenstein, though the records are incomplete. Wittgenstein's daughter, Joan Ripley of Charlottesville, Va., said her father, who was of Jewish ancestry, fled to New York in 1938 and as far as she knows never returned to Vienna, or recovered the bulk of his property after the war. Another relative, though, recalls a "a painting of an old woman, a Monet" that once hung in Wittgenstein's home. The record shows that the Monet next surfaced in a gallery in Stuttgart, Germany, in 1954, where it was bought by Jacques Seligmann, another emigre dealer and associate of de Hauke who has been implicated in wartime art collaboration. Seligmann sold it to the Wertheim Fund.
The $38,500 Degas
But it is the Degas pastel that Wertheim bought the year before he died that has the most troubling history. Maurice Wertheim was a tournament chess player, a founder of the New York Theatre Guild, for a time the owner of The Nation magazine, and the father of Barbara W. Tuchman, the Pulitzer Prize-winning historian. During the war, he was also chairman of the American Jewish Committee. Wertheim was fearful that de Hauke did not have the right to sell the Degas, though the correspondence at the Fogg does not suggest why. To allay his fears, Wertheim had his lawyer call Justin Thannhauser, an associate of de Hauke, while de Hauke was en route to a meeting with Wertheim. Thannhauser told the lawyer that de Hauke did not own the pastel, but was selling it for a Dr. Heer of Zurich. Yet when de Hauke arrived, he told Wertheim that his corporation owned the Degas, but refused to sign a statement saying he had authority to sell it. Wertheim nonetheless handed over a check for $38,500 for the artwork. "Mr. Wertheim made the remark that he is aware of the fact that he took a chance with regard to the title of this picture, but that in view of the information obtained from Thannhauser, the risk involved is rather remote," the Wertheim lawyer, Hermann E. Simon, wrote at the time. Three weeks later, Simon received a letter, apparently from de Hauke's lawyer, asserting that de Hauke bought the picture from Thannhauser - another apparent contradiction. Ivan Gaskell, the Fogg's curator of paintings, sculpture and decorative arts, said that when he first saw the correspondence three or four years ago, he interpreted it to mean that both dealers had an interest in the work. "In and of itself, it did not suggest any suspicion," Gaskell said. But the US archival records, coupled with Swiss government records, suggest that both Thannhauser and de Hauke had much to hide. Thannhauser was a business associate of Wendland, the German dealer and art looter who funneled so many artworks into the black market, and may have stored paintings for Wendland during the war. The original listed owner of the pastelwas Camille Groult. Declassified US documents show that Haberstock, the Nazi art looter with ties to de Hauke, hired another art collaborator to "expertise" the Groult collection, a common step before a confiscation or forced sale. The Groults were apparently not Jewish, and efforts to determine what happened to their collection, or whether the Degas was part of it at the time, were unavailing. The next owner in the chain was Dr. Fritz Heer, identified in National Archives documents as a Swiss collector who purchased at least one looted painting. Several documents that historian Mazurovsky discovered in the National Archives contain intelligence information and post-war State Department correspondence that build a case against de Hauke for his ties to Haberstock and his role in art looting, even suggesting he may have been involved in obtaining paintings for Adolf Hitler, Hermann Goering and Heinrich Himmler. Two months before Wertheim bought the Degas, a handwritten note by a State Department official concluded de Hauke "knowingly handled looted art in his deals with the Germans" and that he should be denied a visa to remain in the United States. Gaskell, the Fogg curator, said he is eager to track down more information about the paintings, especially the Degas. In light of the archival records, he said of the one artwork,"There are clearly red lights all along the way."
Previous coverage and related links are available on Globe Online at www.boston.com. The keyword is paintings. This story ran on page A01 of the Boston Globe on 11/09/97. © Copyright 1997 Globe Newspaper Company.
Home Museum Security Website