THE PRAVDA REPORT DISCUSSION AND TEMPORARILY SHUT DOWN OF THE MUSEUM SECURITY NETWORK MAILINGLIST

Friday, March 28, 2003

 

 

Dear MSNM subscribers,

 

 

This is the very last about the Pravda report rumor I will burden the mailinglist with. I want all of you to know that you did read only a small part of all messages I received about this issue. The MSN hardcopy archive I have been building the past six years (and information I collected even before MSN started) has grown with some 60 pages of text with reactions pro and contra my decision to disseminate the Pravda report. I am very much convinced this part of my archive will constitute interesting reading for present and maybe even future generations.

After this deluge of mails I think I have the right to finally make my opinion, points of view, emotions, disappointments, and gratitude public. I do hope all of you are willing to invest some time in reading my message in full. This may be redundant, but please realize that the English language is not the language my parents taught me but my school teachers did at high school (and plenty of practice thanks to this mailinglist). The avalanche of very articulate messages, mainly from English speaking countries, in many cases made me sort of mute because I do not have the English eloquence of well educated USA museum workers (almost all mails came from the USA).

Before going into some details I want to inform all of you about my general attitude related to  (this) war and terrorism. I feel obliged do this because several subscribers decided without asking me what my political and humanitarian choices are. As list moderator I have never commented on this war because this would be far beyond the scope of the MSNM. Since the Vietnam war ( I was born 1948 and sort of am a child of the tumultuous sixties) the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack on New York was one of the most shocking experiences of my life. At the very day I had telephone contacts with many of my friends and subscribers in the USA. I felt a strong urge to show my sympathy. Soon after this attack I followed Guiliani’s invitation: “The best way to support our town is by visiting us”. During this visit I was most pleasantly welcomed by peers at the Frick Collection and the Museum of Modern Art, plus by one of MSNM’s subscribers. Especially the very long talk I had at the Frick about the 09/11 attack and it’s impact on every New Yorker will never be erased out of my memory. We hardly talked about museum security issues but shared our mutual opinions and emotions about this horrible event.

The last speaker at the 2003 Smithsonian Conference on Cultural Property Protection was a NY firefighter. His speech was impressive, and once again made me realize the scope of the 09/1 events.

As for the war: I do not understand the timing and really am not able to take a standpoint other than that I hope it will be over soon, and will not take too many USA, Canadian, Australian, Iraq (military and citizen), Italian, Polish, and UK lifes. I do not know if there are any other countries in the coalition. It goes without saying that my sympathies are for those as well.

Further I will try and cover the following subjects:

-         the Pravda article, my decision to forward it to the list, and – most importantly – the way I forwarded it;

-         the character of the mailinglist and my role as moderator;

-         my decision to take a time-out of the list.

 

 

THE PRAVDA REPORT.

To explain my decision to, and the way in which I sent this report to the list I really must repeat it in full:

Precision weaponry destroys Museum in Baghdad

On Friday night, a terrorist attack by US/UK warplanes on Baghdad destroyed, among other buildings, the Palace of Peace and a former presidential palace which has now been transformed into a museum. This act of terrorism has been strongly criticized by the authorities in Baghdad, which have called the US Defence Secretary, Donald Rumsfeld “a criminal dog”.
Mohamed Said Al-Sahhaf, the Iraqi Information Minister, questioned ironically “These are military targets?”
Donald Rumsfeld gloated last night that hundreds of “targets” had been destroyed with “success”, while five innocent civilians were murdered by warplanes under his orders.

Timothy BANCROFT-HINCHEY
PRAVDA.Ru

http://english.pravda.ru/
Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey:
http://www.balochistanpost.com/item.asp?ID=3538

 

 

I will not invite you to join me in a close-reading exercise, but want to draw your attention at  the following:

None of the MSNM subscribers wondered why I added the final part to the report:

Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey:
http://www.balochistanpost.com/item.asp?ID=3538

 

I was convinced that I did not need to explain this, nor comment on the contents of the message. It is a Pravda report, and everyone following the news the past weeks knows that at the moment a very strong anti-American sentiment is growing in Russia. I have read the Pravda report in that perspective. But again, why did I add:

Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey:
http://www.balochistanpost.com/item.asp?ID=3538

There was only one reason to do this: I wanted all of you to read another example of T.B-H’s very prejudiced ‘journalism’. Adding this link apparently was a too subtle ‘comment’ on my part. In this respect I did overestimate the talent for subtlety of some of MSNM’s subscribers.

THE MAILINGLIST AND MY ROLE AS MODERATOR.

In the past six years some 1000 MSNM messages were sent to the mailinglist, each message containing some 6 to 7 reports. So in total about 6000 to 7000 reports were disseminated. The Pravda report was just ONE out of this abundance of information!

Notwithstanding the magnitude of information the MSNM is a very passive mailinglist. Over 95% of our 2800 subscribers consume the information I collect and disseminate, and never ever participate actively in this mailinglist.

It was strange (this really is an understatement) to experience that where it comes to criticizing your moderator all of a sudden some of these inactive recipients of free information became very active. Most luckily there also were many subscribers who took some time to send me their support. I want you to know that every unsubscribe message disappointed me, and I really do not intend to comment on individual messages to leave the list. There is one exception I really want to make: Larry Rankine’s (Security manager of Biltmore Castle) message to leave was not only unreasonably aggressive and condemning, but especially disappointing because we met a little over a month ago at the Smithsonian National Conference.

The past few days I have found myself in the position of accused and condemned with only very little space to defend myself. I feel justified to take this space now in my message to all of you.

It is true that I have not always been just your tool for disseminating information about incidents with cultural property, but every now and then I also expressed personal opinions. The subtlety with which I ‘commented’ on the Pravda report did not reach subscribers who’s objective views seem to be obscured by the dreadful events that are taking place in Iraq.

On another notion: after I forwarded the Pravda report and the online discussion about the qualities of your moderator started I received reports about damage to cultural property in Iraq from some of you. Not one single subscriber ever sent me information about the events in Mesopotamia and the impact on cultural property BEFORE this hit-your-moderator thread started.

DECISION TO TAKE SOME TIME OFF

I will take a few weeks off to reflect on the future of this mailinglist and my role as moderator. MSNM has always been a free service – I receive not one single penny for this activity – in which I invest an average of four hours per day. Many of these hours are late at night, or even in the middle of night, and early in the morning. The past 36 hours doubts have grown whether all of this is worth the effort. Is it worth to invest this many hours (and some money) in this free service when the result is that misunderstandings about a decision to forward a report immediately generate attacks at me personally?

The Iraq war really entered my office the past few days via intolerant, patronizing, prejudiced, presumptuous unsubscribe messages. Supporting messages do win in numbers. I am very grateful for those. The impact of negative messages however was stronger.

I really am astonished that working for all of you 7 days per week does not give me more credit when there are doubts about my motives. There is a difference in voluntarily offering a free service and being in your service. Some frustrated subscribes really addressed as if I am in their service and ought to be fired.

There will be a MSNM ‘radio-silence’ for a few weeks. After that time I will inform you about my decision how to face the future. Off list suggestions about MSNM’s future are welcome. These may range from offers to take over from me, to become editor, suggestions for financing MSN, automate the list (Listerv of Majordomo) etc. etc.

Ton Cremers