Museum Security website statistics; over 1000 hits per week

May 24, 2000

CONTENTS:




- May update - stolen art web-sites (Jonathan sazonoff)
- Former library director facing felony theft, misconduct charges
- German town saw Nazi art dealer as local hero--WJC
- China calls for return of 'looted' treasures
- N.Orleans Cemetery Trial Begins
- RE: STOLEN: RARE JUDAICA BOOKS (Antony Anderson)
- Sprinkler Systems & Fire Suppression
- Art on Loan Must Be Protected



From: Jonathan Sazonoff saz@kwom.com

Subject:

May update - stolen art web-sites

Dear Subscribers,
Just a brief note, to inform you of some recent updates of major web-sites dealing with stolen art.
First, Jouve Diffusion is promoting their newest on-line INTEROL most wanted list. http://www.stolenart.net/jouve-diffusion/wanted.htm
Next, INTERPOL (USNCB) continues to update their site. http://www.usdoj.gov/usncb/culturehome.htm
Next, the German BKA have now published their 2000 on-line listings of wanted art. http://www.bka.de/fahndung/kunstwerke/2000/
Next, the Art Loss Register recently posted some missing art works http://www.artloss.com/pics.htm
Also, as most readers have noted, ICOM's Red List is now on-line http://www.icom.org/redlist
And finaly, as always, we try to provide the web's most complete listing of stolen art web-sites, http://www.saztv.com/page26.html. If I'm ever able to figure out my web providers new server, there should be more updates in the near future : )
Hope you find this information helpful.
Jonathan Sazonoff
Saz Productions, Inc.
http://www.saztv.com
Contributing US Ed
Museum Security Network
http://www.museum-security.org/saz.html


Former library director facing felony theft, misconduct charges

EDGERTON, WIS.

The former director of the Edgerton Public Library faces charges of stealing hundreds of books, compact discs and other materials, as well as falsifying a $952 hotel receipt. Marylou Pierce Smith, 53, could face a maximum of 20 years prison and a $20,000 fine if convicted of the felony theft and misconduct in public office charges filed Monday. Her last day at the library was April 5. A city audit of library materials had shown that 514 items valued at $6,864 were missing. The criminal complaint said that Smith, when contacted by police, first denied the allegations, saying other employees were trying to set her up, but later confirmed she had taken the materials. Smith said she ``recognized that she has a serious problem and is under treatment with a psychiatrist to solve them,'' the complaint stated. A search of her home found 148 stolen books, 92 stolen CDs, 10 stolen cassette tapes and one stolen videotape, the complaint said. It said she had given some items to family and friends, who were unaware the things had been stolen, and she ordered some library items knowing she intended to take them home. Bob Krekel, finance director for the city, told police that Smith was supposed to attend an eight-day library conference in New Orleans in 1999. Smith had turned in a reservation confirmation from the hotel and was reimbursed $952, but the hotel told city officials Smith didn't stay there during the conference, the complaint said. Smith was released on a signature bond, pending a preliminary hearing June 8.



German town saw Nazi art dealer as local hero--WJC

By Joan Gralla

NEW YORK (Reuters) - A powerful Jewish advocacy group said Wednesday it had backed up claims that the German city of Augsburg had lauded Adolf Hitler's leading art dealer as a local hero by citing a 1960 statement by its mayor. But the battle between the World Jewish Congress and Augsburg, which since early May has been answering WJC criticisms about its failure to tell visitors about Karl Haberstock's Nazi past, seemed to be calming. The city, in a letter sent on Monday to the congress, reversed itself and promised to consider stripping Haberstock's name from the foundation that manages the paintings he donated. Previously, the museum has said it was insensitive to omit Haberstock's Nazi background from a 1991 catalog on the paintings he once owned. The congress provided Reuters with the letter it received from Ekkehard Gesler, Augsburg cultural affairs spokesman, and the WJC's response, dated Tuesday. Haberstock reaped big profits during World War II by buying at big discounts, art from Jews who were under duress, according to a postwar U.S. military report. And before the war broke out, he made money by selling modern art Hitler had condemned as "degenerate" outside Germany after marking up the prices. The city, located northeast of Munich, denied it had glorified Haberstock. "Never was Haberstock celebrated as a local hero," Gesler wrote the WJC. The WJC used the city's own history to contradict this. Steinberg said that Jonathan Petropoulos, who has written two books on how the Nazis looted art, provided him with a statement by Oberburgermeister Klaus Muller from January 1960, in which he speaks of Haberstock as "a man of the world and a passionate lover of art." The WJC official told Gesler: "The statement speaks for itself." The Augsburg Municipal Art Museum, in its letter to the WJC, defended itself from concerns that Haberstock might have given it art that was taken from Holocaust victims, saying it has given authorities a list of the paintings, and plans to publish the works on the Internet. Petropoulos told Reuters, in a letter sent on Wednesday over the Internet, that: "I have no knowledge of Augsburg having looted art but we just don't know. The collection should be checked." Gesler's letter to the WJC opened a new controversy. The museum said that small captions on the paintings Haberstock donated only refer to the foundation's ownership. Still, this seems to fall short of U.S. standards: the country's museums in 1998 promised to label any art stolen from Jews as Holocaust works. "That this name (Haberstock) should be attached to paintings and the visitor to the museum is in no way made aware of the notorious connections to it must give rise to serious concern," Steinberg wrote. Whether Petropoulos, who says he was prevented from studying the museum's archives, now will be able to do so was not clear. Gesler wrote Steinberg most of the records cover the post-war era, so German laws on classifying material "opposed" a general opening of the files. Petropoulos said the archives were valuable because little is known about what Haberstock did after the war. In its letter to the WJC, the museum did not say when it removed a bust of Habersock from pride of place, near the entrance. Petropoulos said he saw the bust displayed by the entrance when he visited in 1996. At the same time, the museum had a portrait of Haberstock hanging in the galleries, the art expert says. But Gesler wrote the WJC that no portrait of Haberstock or of his wife now were hanging on the walls.



China calls for return of 'looted' treasures

FROM OLIVER AUGUST IN BEIJING

CHINA is demanding the return of hundreds of paintings that were looted from imperial palaces and are now held by the British Museum. The state Worker's Daily newspaper has announced a campaign to repatriate a million stolen artefacts from around the world and Britain is named among the most serious offenders. The paper said: "Many relics were smuggled to Britain. The British Museum has the finest collection of Chinese paintings." China, it said, will set up a special government department to lobby for the return of relics and paintings, which it claimed could be found in more than 200 museums in 47 countries. Xie Chensheng, a government adviser, was quoted as saying that relics were stolen by invading nations or purchased by foreigners at extremely low prices from Chinese warlords and smuggled abroad. The repatriation campaign is also focused on America, France and Japan. At the top of the request list are two paintings held by the British Museum called Nushizhentu and Luoshenfu. These images of Tang Dynasty fairytales are reproduced in many Chinese schoolbooks. The British Museum is also said to have classical Buddhist books taken from the Dunhuang area in the province of Gansu at the beginning of the 19th century. An official at the Cultural Relics Bureau in Beijing said: "Britain has the best Chinese paintings outside China. Most were secretly transported out of the country in the period of the Republic of China [1911-1949] when society was in chaos. They are now kept in the British Museum." A British Museum spokesman said it had received "no intimation" of the campaign. He expressed surprise because there were strong links between the museum and the Chinese, including two recent major exhibitions of Chinese antiquities and many continuing projects. He said that if objects were acquired in good faith, they are held in trust and trustees are forbidden to dispose of any object. "As with any restitution, it would have to be a political matter," he said. The return of China's treasures has become a hot political issue after a Chinese company with links to the Government bought back a number of artefacts at two auctions in Hong Kong this month. Christie's and Sotheby's had refused to hand over the items, saying that they had been legally traded. Chinese nationalists and art historians were outraged by the fact that Beijing had to buy back its own treasures. An Jiayao, a relics expert, said: "If relics have been stolen, then nobody has the right to auction them." The Poly Group, the former arms-dealing agency of the People's Liberation Army, spent £1.6 million to buy back a Qing Dynasty vase. The group has vowed to continue its buying spree and is now trying to recruit other companies to follow its example. A spokesman said: "It is impossible for us to save all the relics abroad. However, we hope we can form an alliance with other commercial enterprises and buy back more." The worst looting took place during the Second Opium War 140 years ago, when British and French troops ransacked Chinese palaces. The problem continues today and the Chinese Government is co-operating with Unesco to hunt tomb raiders who supply the market with Chinese relics in North America and Europe.
(Times London)



N.Orleans Cemetery Trial Begins

NEW ORLEANS (AP) - Two prominent antiques dealers and one of their customers are on trial, accused of putting in orders for thefts of sculptures, urns and benches from ornate above-ground tombs. Four thieves have pleaded guilty and will be sentenced after Roy Boucvalt, owner of the Boucvalt House, and antiques dealers Aaron Jarabica and Peter Patout have been tried. All three are charged with conspiracy and theft. Jury selection began Monday in Criminal District Court. Boucvalt, Jarabica and Patout all deny knowing that any of the art was stolen. Their lawyers have said their clients were set up by thieves hoping to reduce their sentences. Authorities say the theft scheme stretched as far as Los Angeles and New York, where some of the $800,000 in stolen items were recovered. The thieves were caught in 1998, after a worker jotted down the license number of a van cruising among the rows of tombs at Lake Lawn Metairie Cemetery. The cemetery is one of the fanciest in the city. Some of the tombs are built like tiny chapels. One is a pyramid, with a small sphinx in front. Another is a miniature cathedral.


From: Antony F Anderson antonya@antonya.ace.co.uk
To: "'securma@xs4all.nl'" securma@xs4all.nl
Subject:

RE: STOLEN: RARE JUDAICA BOOKS

Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 11:22:50 +-100
Dear Ton,
I thought the attached article by Libby Purves was relevant to this debate.
http://www.the-times.co.uk/news/pages/tim/2000/05/23/timopnope01003.html
Best wishes
Antony


From: Mark Towner markt@NEDCC.ORG
Subject:

Sprinkler Systems & Fire Suppression

Northeast Document Conservation Center published a Technical Leaflet on this subject. It is titled AN INTRODUCTION TO FIRE DETECTION, ALARM, AND AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLERS.
You can access the Technical Leaflet at www.nedcc.org or by emailing oleary@nedcc.org.
Mark Towner

Assistant Director
Northeast Document Conservation Center

100 Brickstone Square

Andover, Massachusetts 01810
Tel: 978-470-1010
http://www.nedcc.org


Art on Loan Must Be Protected

By ROBERT J. HURST
On Gov. George Pataki's desk awaits a bill that most certainly has been passed by the New York Legislature with the best of intentions: it would enhance the authority of state law enforcement officials to seize loaned artwork that officials suspect of having been stolen at some point. But the proposal, as currently drafted, would be likely to sabotage its stated goal, the recovery of stolen art, while dealing an irreparable blow to New York's position as the world's leading magnet for art and cultural exhibitions. The legislation was proposed by Robert Morgenthau, the Manhattan district attorney, after a conflict over ownership of two Egon Schiele paintings that were on loan to the Museum of Modern Art in 1998. Mr. Morgenthau issued a subpoena requiring the museum to keep the paintings, rather than returning them to the lenders, while he investigated a claim that they had been sold under coercion in Europe during the Nazi era. The state Court of Appeals blocked Mr. Morgenthau's subpoena, citing a 1968 law signed by Gov. Nelson Rockefeller that prohibited all seizures of art on loan to nonprofit institutions. The current legislation would legalize seizures in criminal matters. Mr. Morgenthau argues that New York should not be a haven for stolen art. As an art lover, and more deeply, as the son of a Holocaust survivor, I could not more passionately agree with that principle. But this proposed amendment would backfire. It is already extremely difficult to persuade individuals and institutions to lend art for exhibitions. The threat that works might be seized if a prosecutor found some reason to suspect a history of theft would be one more deterrent. Lenders virtually never have any awareness that their works of art may have a tainted past; if they thought such a thing likely, they would hardly be offering the art for a public exhibition. But they still want to feel assured that their art is protected, and by providing that protection, the Rockefeller-era law has invited art from all sources to New York's museums and colleges. By discouraging owners from lending any art to New York, the amendment would also aggravate the very problem it seeks to address, by keeping more art away from public view, where stolen works are most likely to be spotted. Even if a prosecutor wished to look into the facts of a particular case, the authority to investigate crime is unaffected by the existing law -- only the right to seize property is barred. The claimants are free to pursue their claims at the end of the loan. New York has a superb record in support of Holocaust victims and their families who were victims of art confiscation. Several New York museums have already released lists of paintings whose Nazi-era provenance is not fully known. And recently, the state's Holocaust Claims Processing Office, created by Governor Pataki, was influential in helping Austrian claimants recover a picture held in a North Carolina museum. Legal procedures already exist to aid claimants. In the case that sparked the current controversy, it turned out that one of the seized Schiele paintings was in fact returned after the war to relatives of the original owners; the other had been mistakenly given to the family of a different victim. What possible role the New York criminal justice system can usefully play in sorting out complex ownership claims -- frequently multinational in nature -- remains unclear. There is nothing to gain, and much to lose, by beginning to treat civil disputes over title as criminal matters. Theft of art is an immoral act which, when coupled with the stealing from Holocaust victims, cries out for redress. But in seeking redress for such evil actions, we must take care not to enter into a pattern of destructiveness with far-reaching, unintended consequences. Lenders who generously make their art available to the public should be protected and encouraged, not threatened, if we are to address the claims of those with legitimate grievances while preserving New York's cultural primacy.
Robert J. Hurst is chairman of the board of the Jewish Museum.